Transcendental Spirituality and Acquaintance With the Activities of the Domestic National Transplant Center as Factors Shaping Attitudes Toward Organ Donation
“…Only about one‐third of Western Muslims believe that organ donation is compatible with their faith . Studies conducted in Spain, Poland, Israel, and South Africa have found that Muslims are more reluctant to donate their organs compared to adherents of other faiths . In a study comparing attitudes of South Asians in the UK, Muslims reported less favorable attitudes toward organ donation than Hindus or Sikhs .…”
Islam is the second most practiced religion globally, and the number of Muslims in Western countries has been increasing due to recent trends in migration. Studies have shown that Muslims in the Western world have more negative attitudes toward organ donation and transplantation compared with individuals from other religious backgrounds. Multiple barriers have been postulated that may prevent Muslims from exploring organ donation or transplantation. We conducted a literature review with the goal of summarizing the opinions of major Sunni and Shia scholars and Islamic bodies about organ donation and transplantation, including their opinions and rulings on the neurological determination of death to inform healthcare professionals, community members, and leaders. We also identified factors and attitudes that may prevent members of the Muslim community from achieving equitable access to transplantation or from consenting to donate organs during life or after death. Key factors or concerns identified included: lack of information regarding organ donation, mistrust of the healthcare system, family opinions, sacredness of the body, lack of clear understanding of religious rulings, and opinions of religious leaders. Studies have suggested that partnering with religious leaders to address these concerns may help foster positive attitudes toward organ donation and transplantation.
“…Only about one‐third of Western Muslims believe that organ donation is compatible with their faith . Studies conducted in Spain, Poland, Israel, and South Africa have found that Muslims are more reluctant to donate their organs compared to adherents of other faiths . In a study comparing attitudes of South Asians in the UK, Muslims reported less favorable attitudes toward organ donation than Hindus or Sikhs .…”
Islam is the second most practiced religion globally, and the number of Muslims in Western countries has been increasing due to recent trends in migration. Studies have shown that Muslims in the Western world have more negative attitudes toward organ donation and transplantation compared with individuals from other religious backgrounds. Multiple barriers have been postulated that may prevent Muslims from exploring organ donation or transplantation. We conducted a literature review with the goal of summarizing the opinions of major Sunni and Shia scholars and Islamic bodies about organ donation and transplantation, including their opinions and rulings on the neurological determination of death to inform healthcare professionals, community members, and leaders. We also identified factors and attitudes that may prevent members of the Muslim community from achieving equitable access to transplantation or from consenting to donate organs during life or after death. Key factors or concerns identified included: lack of information regarding organ donation, mistrust of the healthcare system, family opinions, sacredness of the body, lack of clear understanding of religious rulings, and opinions of religious leaders. Studies have suggested that partnering with religious leaders to address these concerns may help foster positive attitudes toward organ donation and transplantation.
“…Ethnicity shapes perceptions of identity and belonging, which, in like manner, shape attitudes toward organ donation. 83 , 84 Religion” is formally defined as believing in a Divinity and feeling a commitment to a specific organized religion. 85 There are 2 major religions in Israel: Judaism, and Islam.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another factor underlying negative attitudes to organ donation was the feeling of estrangement or not fully being part of the wider society. 83 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another factor underlying negative attitudes to organ donation was the feeling of estrangement or not fully being part of the wider society. 83 Thus, religious beliefs shape a person's attitudes to organ donation. [89][90][91][92][93][94] The most common reason for refusal to donate had traditionally been based on religious objections.…”
Kidney transplantation has developed to the stage where it is currently the most cost-effective treatment for patients suffering from end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) and, when available, offers them the highest quality of life. Yet, kidney transplantation is challenged by cultural and traditional beliefs; thus, this study sought to evaluate the willingness to pay for a kidney transplant in a culturally sensitive population. A self-administered survey was completed by 734 end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) patients. A quantitative method and survey design were chosen and employed descriptive, correlational, nonparametric, and multivariate statistical tests. Participants were willing to pay a mean amount of $40 751.36 for a living donor kidney transplant, whereas the mean is considerably lower, $18 350.51, for a deceased donor kidney. Significant predictors of the willingness to pay (WTP) for a kidney transplant from a living donor and a deceased donor were found, among them: religiosity and ethnicity. The participants’ willingness to pay for a kidney transplant could attest to significant benefits in enhancing patient well-being. The willingness to pay differentially for a donation from a deceased or a living donor stems from the higher chances of success with a living-donor organ as well as from moral and religious motives. In Israel kidney transplantation is not tradable in the free market and is fully funded by the state. The average cost of kidney transplantation in Israel is $61 714.50. Since the cost exceeds the utility and since the economic literature suggests that the funding of healthcare interventions should be provided up to the point where the costs of that funding equal the benefits that society derives from it, crucial revisions in public health policy should be made. Education may have a significant impact on the approach to kidney donation and organ donation in general.
“…Each question is scored separately with higher scores representing a higher likelihood of participating towards the intended action. The scale has been used in various studies (e.g., Morgan et al, 2001;Melnikov et al, 2017;Siegel et al, 2014), and is comprised of six items, such as: "I support the idea of organ donation for transplantation purposes," and "I view organ donation as a benefit to humanity." The mean of the scale for participants was 5.82 (SD= 1.37).…”
Section: Attitudes Towards Organ Donationmentioning
A health communication campaign to promote organ donation was conducted in partnership with Donate Life America at a rural university campus. Materials included posters, flyers, and postcards, along with personal contact. Participants included university students located at a rural university campus in a survey in a pre-post intervention during National Donate Life Month. Data from research about the campaign included the target audience who completed surveys prior to and after the campaign about attitude and intent towards donation. Likewise, after pre-post intervention of the campaign, reported rates for donor registration increased, and findings indicate that registration rates in this rural university campus are similar to baseline rates in other regions. Based on the population, additional health communication strategies should address disparate groups develop appropriately tailored interventions. Local community health campaigns may be effective in promoting donor registration and increasing communication and beneficial outcomes surrounding organ donation.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.