2021
DOI: 10.1109/jlt.2019.2944830
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transceiver Imbalances Compensation and Monitoring by Receiver DSP

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the receiver's constant modulus algorithm only compensates for the receiver side device imperfections and passes the transmitter IQ imbalance. After carrier phase recovery, the I and Q signals are separated again, and the 2 × 2 widely linear equalizer compensates and monitors the transmitter IQ imbalance [12,[34][35][36]. Besides the adaptive equalizer, the clock recovery algorithm detects the time error and monitors the skew [37,38].…”
Section: In-field Measurement After Servicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the receiver's constant modulus algorithm only compensates for the receiver side device imperfections and passes the transmitter IQ imbalance. After carrier phase recovery, the I and Q signals are separated again, and the 2 × 2 widely linear equalizer compensates and monitors the transmitter IQ imbalance [12,[34][35][36]. Besides the adaptive equalizer, the clock recovery algorithm detects the time error and monitors the skew [37,38].…”
Section: In-field Measurement After Servicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Amplitude and phase imbalance generated at the receiver side can be monitored and mitigated before CD compensation by means of the Gram-Schmidt orthogonalization procedure (GSOP) [23]. At the same time, receiver IQ-skew can be handled together with channel equalization also in the presence of large accumulated CD by modifying the 2x2 equalizer into a 4x2 structure [24].…”
Section: Performance In Presence Of Transceiver Iq-imbalancesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the same time, receiver IQ-skew can be handled together with channel equalization also in the presence of large accumulated CD by modifying the 2x2 equalizer into a 4x2 structure [24]. On the contrary, transmitter impairments can only be compensated after FOE and CPR [23]. This implies that transmitter impairments will strongly affect the signal at the equalization stage also after convergence of the equalizer.…”
Section: Performance In Presence Of Transceiver Iq-imbalancesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gram-Schmidt orthogonalization procedure (GSOP) [4] and Löwdin orthogonalization procedure (LOP) [5] are two common compensation algorithms of amplitude/phase imbalance and all these algorithms are based on statistical analysis principle. The orthogonalization matrix obtained by these algorithms can be further used to estimate amplitude/phase imbalance [7]- [8]. Among them, GSOP is an asymmetrical orthogonalization scheme with lower complexity but will amplify the quantization noise; while LOP is based on symmetric orthogonalization with higher complexity and is robust to quantization noise [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These schemes can monitor Rx and Tx imbalances before and after FO compensation, respectively. Liang et al uses GSOP and MIMO algorithms to estimate transceiver IQ amplitude/phase imbalance and skew [19]; our previous research utilizes the convex hull assisted ellipse correction and k-means clustering assisted blind phase search scheme to monitor transceiver IQ amplitude/phase imbalance [17]. However, these existing schemes can only separate the transceiver IQ imbalances and are unable to separate the transceiver XY imbalances.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%