2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.08.177
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transcaval embolization as the preferred approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
(10 reference statements)
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…26 Lastly, a transvenous approach to transcaval embolization has been described. 27,28 With this approach, a curved puncture needle system is used for sac access from the inferior vena cava. This approach provides improved patient comfort with supine positioning but can predispose to hemorrhage, arteriovenous fistulae, or nontarget embolization material entering the vena cava.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…26 Lastly, a transvenous approach to transcaval embolization has been described. 27,28 With this approach, a curved puncture needle system is used for sac access from the inferior vena cava. This approach provides improved patient comfort with supine positioning but can predispose to hemorrhage, arteriovenous fistulae, or nontarget embolization material entering the vena cava.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a series of 10 patients, Burley et al performed transcaval access with Rosch-Uchida sets, and embolized using coils, and, if needed, gelatin granules and thrombin slurry. 19 Nine of 10 (90%) patients had decreased aneurysm sac diameters on follow-up imaging at 6 months. Hyatt et al described the use of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided approach for Rosch-Uchida needle endoleak access from femoral approach.…”
Section: Transvenous Transcavalmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The most established approaches can be broadly classified into transarterial and direct sac puncture techniques. [17][18][19] Newer, alternative approaches including transgraft 20 and perigraft 21 endoleak catheterizations have also been described. Determination of optimal approach is based on analysis of endoleak and feeder branch anatomy as well as available imaging equipment and provider experience.…”
Section: Embolization Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…9 Giles et al 47 had an 83% transcaval technical success in 29 patients for treating TIIEL. Burley et al 48 and Scali et al 49 reported 100% success rate on small series (n ¼ 10, n ¼ 6) of patients with TIIEL treated by a transcaval approach; nevertheless, the studies had a short follow-up of 6 months and 8.1 months (range, 2-22 months), respectively. Postoperative complications following this technique include inadvertent intracaval embolization of coils, retroperitoneal hemorrhage, unintentional puncture of the existing endograft leading to type III endoleak, injury to periaortic/ caval structures, and aortocaval fistula.…”
Section: Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%