“…3,16,17) Although several complications such as T-wave inversion on an electrogram, embolization of the coil to the pulmonary artery, and transient arrhythmias were experienced in 30% of patients, 3,16) complete closure of CAVF was obtained in 78% to 82% of patients by transcatheter embolization. 3,17) However, a retrospective review to determine the comparative therapeutic efficacy of operation and coil embolization showed that coil embolization was possible, at most, in 6 (38%) of 16 patients, 16) and has indicated that the requirements for satisfactory coil embolization of a CAF include the ability to safely cannulate the branch coronary artery that supplies the fistula, the absence of large branch vessels that can be inadvertently embolized, the presence of a single, narrow restrictive drainage site into the cardiac chamber or vessel, and the absence of multiple fistulous connections. 3,16,17) According to these results, transcatheter embolization is considered to be a reasonable alternative to standard surgical closure in a selected group of patients.…”