Transcatheter Device Closure of Postsurgical Residual Left to Right Shunt Lesions in Children during the Immediate Postoperative Period

Abstract

Objectives Postoperative residual shunts in the form of ventricular septal defects (VSD) and patent ductus arteriosus (PDA), if hemodynamically significant, can lead to symptoms of left ventricular volume overload and delayed recovery. The standard management is redo surgery, which can lead to significant morbidity and mortality. Device closure of such defects offers an alternative management strategy in selected cases. This study aims to examine the utility of device closure of residual left-to-right shunts in the pediatric age group in the immediate postoperative period. Method A retrospective analysis of hospital records was done from March 2018 to December 2022 to analyze the device closure in postoperative residual shunts. The success rate, complications, hospital length of stay, and midterm follow-up were analyzed. Results A total of four postoperative patients underwent VSD device closure and one patient underwent PDA device closure. The median age at transcatheter procedure was 6 years (range 3–10 years). The median time interval between the surgical procedure and the device closure procedure was 4 days (range 2–15 days). The indication for device closure was left ventricular volume overload in three patients and two patients had persistent pleural effusion. Qp:Qs was more than 1.5:1 in all five patients. The amplatzer duct occluder I (ADO-I) device was used in four patients and the ADO-II in one patient. There was no residual shunt post-deployment, with no major complication. The mean follow-up period was 2 years and all the patients had no residual shunt. Conclusion This case series, with its limitation of only five cases, has shown that device closure of hemodynamically significant residual postoperative left-to-right shunt lesions is an effective alternative strategy to redo surgery in older children. Further study is required with a larger sample size, and a longer follow-up is needed to evaluate its long-term safety and efficacy.