2013
DOI: 10.1007/s11748-013-0268-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transcatheter closure of secundum atrial septal defect

Abstract: Since the introduction of transcatheter closure of atrial septal defect, device closure has become the alternative treatment of selected atrial defects. Although excellent results have been reported for transcatheter closure, concerns have arisen regarding complications, including residual shunt, systemic or pulmonary embolization of the device, and erosion and perforation of the cardiac chamber. Those complications are rare but potentially serious adverse events that may require immediate surgical interventio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The adverse events rate of 11.9% after percutaneous device closure in our study is in line with or slightly higher than other studies. [25][26][27] We have used a definition of adverse events applicable to a previous study, which facilitates comparison between studies. 23 The definition of adverse events is wider in ours and in the study by Bartakin et al than is generally applied, which may explain the slightly increased frequency of adverse events following percutaneous closure compared to some other studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The adverse events rate of 11.9% after percutaneous device closure in our study is in line with or slightly higher than other studies. [25][26][27] We have used a definition of adverse events applicable to a previous study, which facilitates comparison between studies. 23 The definition of adverse events is wider in ours and in the study by Bartakin et al than is generally applied, which may explain the slightly increased frequency of adverse events following percutaneous closure compared to some other studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, our institution did not experience serious complications after trans-catheter device closure, such as erosion of aortic Valsalva, cardiac perforation, or late cardiac tamponade [4,[6][7][8][9]. These favorable outcomes were provided by the presence of technically sophisticated cardiac catheter interventionists and their careful selection of patients and devices.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Moreover, its cosmetic superiority is another attractive advantage for children and adult females. On the contrary, late significant complications could occur after transcatheter device closure, and outcomes of surgical closure required after trans-catheter device closure are significantly worse, as opposed to that after primary surgical closure [4,[6][7][8][9][10][11]. Therefore, collaboration of cardiac catheter interventionists and surgeons is more essential to treat patients with ASD in the current era.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is more serious that residual septal defects are frequently associated with surgery-related side-effect complications, such as reoperation, infection, sternotomy scarring, and even death ( Gaynor et al, 2001 ; Oses et al, 2010 ). To avoid those side effects of surgery, interventional closure has been developed to the main treatment to septal defects ( Huang et al, 2013 ; Shimpo et al, 2013 ; Morray, 2019 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%