2004
DOI: 10.1002/ccd.10753
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transcatheter closure of double atrial septal defects with a single Amplatzer device

Abstract: Transcatheter closure of single secundum atrial defects has become the standard of treatment. The purpose of our study was to analyze the results of using a single Amplatzer device for closure of double atrial septal defects. Such defects were diagnosed in 41 out of 363 patients with atrial septal defects (ASDs) closed by transcatheter method. In 39, a single Amplatzer device was used. The size of the larger defect ranged from 5 to 18 mm, the smaller defect from 2 to 7 mm, with the distance between the borders… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
30
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
4
30
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Data about the feasibility and efficacy of using transcatheter approach to close the multiple ASDs are limited [3][4][5][6][7][8]. Cao et al [3] and Butera [4] reported the clinical result of percutaneous closure of multiple ASDs and provided initial experience of device closure for this type of ASD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Data about the feasibility and efficacy of using transcatheter approach to close the multiple ASDs are limited [3][4][5][6][7][8]. Cao et al [3] and Butera [4] reported the clinical result of percutaneous closure of multiple ASDs and provided initial experience of device closure for this type of ASD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Presenting with various morphologies, those defects are often difficult to close via transcatheter approach in technical aspect [3,5,8]. Meanwhile, due to the special design of ASD occluder device, as for two or more ASDs with close distance (<7 mm) between each other, percutaneous closure using multiple devices is also not recommended due to potential interface between the devices [3][4][5][6][7][8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A large single Amplatzer device may be deployed in the larger defect to occlude two or more smaller defects as used by and others (Roman et al 2002). While examining this technique, Szkutnik et al (2004) found that a smaller defect less than 7 mm distance from the larger defect had a 100% closure rate at 1 month follow-up. The device in the larger defect decreases the distance between the two defects or even compress the smaller defect .…”
Section: Multiple or Fenestrated Defectsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Szkutnik et al [6] reported the feasibility of this approach in 2004. A distance of less than 7 mm between defects is considered appropriate for this procedure, and a larger device should be employed to cover all the defects.…”
Section: Multi-fenestrated Asdmentioning
confidence: 99%