2000
DOI: 10.1136/heart.84.3.320
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transcatheter closure of atrial septal defects using the Cardio-Seal implant

Abstract: Objective-To review the outcomes of transcatheter closure of atrial septal defects using the Cardio-Seal implant. Design-A prospective interventional study. Setting-Tertiary referral centre. Patients-The first 50 patients (median age 9.7 years) who underwent attempted percutaneous occlusion. Interventions-Procedures were done under general anaesthesia and transoesophageal guidance between December 1996 and July 1998. Main outcome measures-Success of deployment, complications, and assessment of right ventricula… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
50
0
7

Year Published

2002
2002
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
50
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Broken arms, however, were also reported for this new device. 10 Unacceptable detachment between occluder and counter-occluder were reported in the buttoned device, 12 and the AngelWings device was not retrievable into the sheath after delivering into the right atrium. Surgical intervention is needed when problems develop with these devices.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Broken arms, however, were also reported for this new device. 10 Unacceptable detachment between occluder and counter-occluder were reported in the buttoned device, 12 and the AngelWings device was not retrievable into the sheath after delivering into the right atrium. Surgical intervention is needed when problems develop with these devices.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, it is convenient to convert to a CPB operation in case of emergency events. Sixth, the approach is inexpensive (Pedra et al, 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ASD device closure usually is a procedure of choice for ASD secondom when the patient has good rims and files full the criteria for that [8][9][10] rhythm disturbance is very rare complication of this procedure [7], and usual common in small children who has large defects need large device for suitable closure. Patient who needs device size ≥ 18 mm and device / patient height ratio > 0.18 are Carrie the higher risk factors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%