2015
DOI: 10.5582/bst.2015.01089
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transarterial Y90 radioembolization versus chemoembolization for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: A meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
36
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
3
36
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The observed pooled progression probability was 56% at 1 year and 73% at 2 years after therapy [55]. Another meta-analysis of eight studies involving 1499 patients reported significantly longer overall survival and time to progression with 90 Y SIRT than with transarterial chemoembolization in patients with HCC, although the latter may be preferred in patients with low hepatic reserve who are candidates for liver transplant [56]. Similar favorable pooled outcome results have been reported with systematic review and meta-analysis of data on unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and meta-static NETs [57, 58].…”
Section: Selective Internal Radioembolization Of Malignant Liver Lesionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The observed pooled progression probability was 56% at 1 year and 73% at 2 years after therapy [55]. Another meta-analysis of eight studies involving 1499 patients reported significantly longer overall survival and time to progression with 90 Y SIRT than with transarterial chemoembolization in patients with HCC, although the latter may be preferred in patients with low hepatic reserve who are candidates for liver transplant [56]. Similar favorable pooled outcome results have been reported with systematic review and meta-analysis of data on unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and meta-static NETs [57, 58].…”
Section: Selective Internal Radioembolization Of Malignant Liver Lesionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the radioembolization procedure, microspheres bonded with a radioisotope (yttrium-90 [Y-90]) are infused into the arteries that supply the tumor. 15,23 Retrospective reviews have reported comparable or improved OS with TARE versus TACE, [24][25][26] and a randomized trial reported a significantly longer median time to progression after TARE (>26 vs 6.8 months) but no difference in OS. 19 On the basis of liver explant pathology after radioembolization and subsequent transplantation, 61% of treated lesions (and 89% of lesions <3 cm) exhibited complete pathologic necrosis.…”
Section: Radioembolizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, new approaches have been introduced as either standard minimally invasive procedures or adjuvant therapies in order to improve the survival status of HCC patients: yttrium-90 radioembolization (TARE-90Y), radiotherapy (RT), percutaneous acetic acid injection (PAI), external-beam radiation therapy (EBRT), drug-eluting beads-transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE), percutaneous ethanol injection (PEI) and sorafenib (SOR) [813]. Studies in the current literature suggest that standard minimally invasive procedures in combination with adjuvant therapies may be more efficacious than monotherapy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%