2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.102902
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transanal total mesorectal excision and transabdominal robotic surgery for rectal cancer: A retrospective study

Abstract: Background Transabdominal robotic surgery and transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) are newly introduced strategies for rectal cancer. These procedures might have many advantages in rectal cancer treatment in terms of improving oncological and functional outcomes, especially in cases involving advanced cancer or technical difficulty. In the present study, we aimed to clarify the advantages and disadvantages of transabdominal robotic surgery and laparoscopic TaTME as a hybrid surgery for rect… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the belief that incorporating the advantages of each of these techniques could achieve a safer and less invasive surgery and, consequently, better oncological outcomes, we established hybrid TaTME at our institution. To our knowledge, few reports of this technique have been published [ 21 24 ], and the present study is the first to compare it with conventional TaTME regarding safety and feasibility. We found that the short-term outcomes of hybrid TaTME were comparable to those of conventional TaTME, which was considered acceptable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Based on the belief that incorporating the advantages of each of these techniques could achieve a safer and less invasive surgery and, consequently, better oncological outcomes, we established hybrid TaTME at our institution. To our knowledge, few reports of this technique have been published [ 21 24 ], and the present study is the first to compare it with conventional TaTME regarding safety and feasibility. We found that the short-term outcomes of hybrid TaTME were comparable to those of conventional TaTME, which was considered acceptable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Since June 2020, we have performed TaTME in combination with the abdominal robotic approach (hybrid TaTME) for a safer, less invasive surgery. Because reports on this technique are scarce, the feasibility and safety of hybrid TaTME are unclear [21][22][23][24]. Therefore, this study evaluated the feasibility and safety of hybrid TaTME compared with conventional TaTME for low rectal cancer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mean operation time was 340 minutes in the previous cases mentioned in Table 1 . Currently, at our hospital, TaTME is indicated for difficult surgical cases of advanced rectal cancer after preoperative chemotherapy and for male intersphincteric resection cases [ 14 ]. However, we have now expanded the indication for TaTME to include ulcerative colitis lesions that might be cancerous.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Robot-assisted total mesorectal excision (TME) and trans-anal TME (TaTME) are important surgical strategies for rectal cancer [ 1 , 2 ], with advantages for improving oncological and functional outcomes [ 1–3 ]. Hybrid surgery, which comprises an abdominal robotic approach with TaTME, has been reported as a novel strategy for securing surgical margin in cases involving advanced cancer or technical difficulties [ 4 , 5 ]. Herein, we describe a case of hybrid robot-assisted abdominoperineal resection (APR), supported by the trans-perineal approach, for anal gland adenocarcinoma with vaginal invasion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%