2009
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1337166
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transaction Costs and Trolls: Strategic Behavior by Individual Inventors, Small Firms and Entrepreneurs in Patent Litigation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Conte and Vivarelli (2005), for instance, find for Italian microdata between 1998 and 2000 that large firms rely heavily on own R&D innovative effort, while small firms more actively participate in cooperation agreements and business groups, including the acquisition of external technology, rather than choosing costly and time-consuming patent strategies. Ball and Kesan (2009) argue that due to high transaction costs of litigation, small firms may not be able to effectively monitor their patent rights and consequently choose not to apply for patents at all. Both observations give a qualitative argument, as to why inputand output-related R&D activity measures cause different reactions depending on firm size.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conte and Vivarelli (2005), for instance, find for Italian microdata between 1998 and 2000 that large firms rely heavily on own R&D innovative effort, while small firms more actively participate in cooperation agreements and business groups, including the acquisition of external technology, rather than choosing costly and time-consuming patent strategies. Ball and Kesan (2009) argue that due to high transaction costs of litigation, small firms may not be able to effectively monitor their patent rights and consequently choose not to apply for patents at all. Both observations give a qualitative argument, as to why inputand output-related R&D activity measures cause different reactions depending on firm size.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior studies reveal that small firms litigate more, but they bear higher stakes than large firms (Allison et al 2004;Ball and Kesan 2009;Bessen and Meurer 2006). Large enterprises benefit more than small firms, owing to their higher success rates in litigation (Schliessler 2013).…”
Section: Empirical Enrichmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Starting with medium sized firms, measured in terms of 51 to 250 employees, table 5 shows that the effect on private R&D intensity is also significantly positive, but smaller compared to the average of all firms. We estimate a difference in the R&D intensity of about 1.7 to 1.8 percentage points.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In model II we therefore try to reduce the number of variables used in a stepwise regression approach, that starts from a slim model only containing industry dummies and subsequently adds 4 For estimation we use software codes for Stata by Becker & Ichino (2002) as well as Leuven & Sianesi (2003). 5 We use the Epanechnikow kernel as default and apply different values for the bandwidth, which are commonly proposed in the literature (see e.g. Jones et al, 1996).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%