2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2018.04.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transabdominal Direct Sac Puncture Embolization of Type II Endoleaks after Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
27
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
3
27
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This involves the direct percutaneous puncture of the aneurysm sac. It is most commonly performed via a translumbar approach with the patient positioned prone on the operating table but may also be performed transabdominally [ 56 ] when there is an anterior endoleak. It can be performed under general anaesthesia, or under sedation and local anaesthesia, depending on the patient and the potential difficulty of the procedure.…”
Section: Management Of Secondary Endoleaks—evarmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This involves the direct percutaneous puncture of the aneurysm sac. It is most commonly performed via a translumbar approach with the patient positioned prone on the operating table but may also be performed transabdominally [ 56 ] when there is an anterior endoleak. It can be performed under general anaesthesia, or under sedation and local anaesthesia, depending on the patient and the potential difficulty of the procedure.…”
Section: Management Of Secondary Endoleaks—evarmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Outcomes of Direct Sac Puncture Embolisation: There are only two papers that have specifically reported the outcomes of direct sac puncture embolisation [ 56 , 57 ]. In the larger of these studies, Zener et al (2018) reported on 33 transabdominal embolisations in 30 patients using a range of embolic agents with a technical success rate of 97% and clinical success of 85%, defined as freedom from sac growth (Table 4 ).…”
Section: Management Of Secondary Endoleaks—evarmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The indication for treatment typically includes persistent endoleak (> 6 months) and continued sac expansion (> 0.5 cm) (Yamada et al, 2015; Ozdemir et al, 2013). Frequently used strategies include: 1) transarterial embolization of the feeding vessel accessed from the superior mesenteric or internal iliac artery collaterals; and 2) embolization via direct sac puncture from a translumbar (Ozdemir et al, 2013) or transabdominal (Zener et al, 2018) approach. The surgical options include ligation of the source vessels laparoscopically or open repair with feeding vessel ligation and aneurysmorraphy (Scali et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, we performed transabdominal direct puncture embolization because the patient presented again with type II endoleak after transarterial embolization and his endoleak was anatomically suitable for a transabdominal approach. Our institution is experienced with transabdominal embolizations, having performed 33 for type II endoleak between 2011 and 2016 with a technical success rate of 97% 10 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The benefits of transabdominal embolization over a translumbar technique include better toleration of surgery with supine positioning and easier cannulation of lumbar artery origins 10 . A transcaval approach may have lowered the probability of bowel injury, but it presents unique risks, including inadvertent intracaval embolization and aortocaval fistula 11 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%