1986
DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9378(86)80006-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transabdominal and transvaginal endosonography: Evaluation of the cervix and lower uterine segment in pregnancy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
17
0
6

Year Published

1990
1990
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
17
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed ample evidence in the literature supports the reliability of sonographic evaluation of cervical shortening as measured by cervical length in assessment of preterm cervix. 9 These previous studies confirm the sensitivity of sonography in cervical length measurement and the strong association between premature cervical length shortening and clinical preterm labour in high risk population. However, these large series fail to provide sonographic evaluation of cervical length for normal term pregnancy, or to evaluate cervical length alteration in asymptomatic group.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Indeed ample evidence in the literature supports the reliability of sonographic evaluation of cervical shortening as measured by cervical length in assessment of preterm cervix. 9 These previous studies confirm the sensitivity of sonography in cervical length measurement and the strong association between premature cervical length shortening and clinical preterm labour in high risk population. However, these large series fail to provide sonographic evaluation of cervical length for normal term pregnancy, or to evaluate cervical length alteration in asymptomatic group.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Several studies have compared TA and TV approaches to cervical assessment but their findings are inconsistent. [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23] Attempting TA assessment postvoid appears to give better TA-TV measurement correlation, but the cervix cannot be visualised transabdominally in >40% of cases; and in >80% of cases with a short cervix (<20 mm in closed length). 11,19 Several groups have examined a strategy of using TA assessment as a baseline, proceeding to a TV scan if the cervix could either not be visualised or was short; between 57 and 60% of women still needed to have a TV scan and 85% of cervices deemed short by TV assessment would have been missed if they had solely been screened with a TA approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TVS has been reported as a useful tool in the folStructural characteristics of the cervix such as the internal and external os, cervical canal, low-up of pregnant women at risk for cervical incompetance (Figure 2). 3 Monitoring cervical dy- namics may identify early changes necessitating cerclage procedures, or may prevent unnecessary intervention. Areas of increased echogenicity or hypoechoic areas with an irregular outline may signify changes compatible with cervical carcinoma (Figure 3).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%