1966
DOI: 10.1002/anie.196601261
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trans‐Selective Olefin Syntheses

Abstract: is removed in a vacuum and the residue is taken up in 200 ml of 0.1 % aqueous hydrocyanic acid and added t o a column (40 mm diameter by 100 mm) of carboxymethylcellulose.Most of the unchanged cyanocobinamide runs through the column; the rest is eluted with 2 % acetic acid, and immediately thereafter the cobyric ester (3) of 1-aminopropan-2-01 is eluted with a 1 : l mixture of 2 % acetic acid and 2 % ammonium acetate solution. This ester is purified by extraction with phenol[3J, taken up in 100 ml of water, an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
66
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
2
66
0
Order By: Relevance
“…31a Acetylthiourea was also prepared from the reaction of acetyl chloride and ammonium thiocyanate according to the reported procedure in the literature. 31b The chemoselective reaction of dimethylacetylenedicarboxylate (2) and N-ethyl-N'-propionylurea (1) in the presence of PPh 3 , produced products which were characterized as phosphoranes (3a-b) on the basis of spectral data (Scheme 1). The probable mechanistic pathway that best explains the synthesis of these compounds, is depicted in Scheme 2.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…31a Acetylthiourea was also prepared from the reaction of acetyl chloride and ammonium thiocyanate according to the reported procedure in the literature. 31b The chemoselective reaction of dimethylacetylenedicarboxylate (2) and N-ethyl-N'-propionylurea (1) in the presence of PPh 3 , produced products which were characterized as phosphoranes (3a-b) on the basis of spectral data (Scheme 1). The probable mechanistic pathway that best explains the synthesis of these compounds, is depicted in Scheme 2.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Z)-Undec-5-ene (5): [29] According to the general procedure, the reaction of 1 (238 mg, 1.062 mmol) with tri-n-butylindium (Z)-Nona-1,3-diene (6): [30] According to the general procedure, the reaction of 1 (215 mg, 0.959 mmol) with trivinylindium (0. [(Z)-Non-3-en-1-ynyl]benzene (7): [31] According to the general procedure, the reaction of 1 (240 mg, 1.071 mmol) with tris(phenyl- non-3-en-1-ynyl]silane (8): [32] According to the general procedure, the reaction of 1 (261 mg, [(E)-Hept-1-enyl]benzene (9): [27] According to the general procedure, the reaction of 2 (230 mg, (E)-Oct-2-ene (10): [33] According to the general procedure, the reaction of 2 (224 mg, 1.000 mmol) with trimethylindium (0. (E)-Undec-5-ene (11): [29] According to the general procedure, the reaction of 2 (232 mg, 1.035 mmol) with tri-n-butylindium (E)-Nona-1,3-diene (12): [30] According to the general procedure, the reaction of 2 (210 mg, 0.937 mmol) with trivinylindium (0.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, we tested the Schlosser reaction [21] starting from aldehyde 8; this procedure led to the olefin 10b, albeit in poor yield and selectivity (Scheme 4). However, by altering the bases used for the two consecutive steps (from phenyllithium to n-butyllithium) as well as the equivalents used (from 2 to 1 equiv.…”
Section: Synthesis By Wittig-type Olefinationmentioning
confidence: 99%