2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2018.12.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trajectory tracking control for double-joint manipulator systems driven by pneumatic artificial muscles based on a nonlinear extended state observer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In practice, the disturbances included both the continuous and discontinuous terms. The NESO [43], [44] is well-known as the disturbance rejection with the continuous term. Furthermore, the control design procedure is implemented based on the Barrier Lyapunov function to handle the time-varying output constraints of the controlled system.…”
Section: Proposed Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In practice, the disturbances included both the continuous and discontinuous terms. The NESO [43], [44] is well-known as the disturbance rejection with the continuous term. Furthermore, the control design procedure is implemented based on the Barrier Lyapunov function to handle the time-varying output constraints of the controlled system.…”
Section: Proposed Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dynamic model of the PAM is very difficult for practical control and use because of the presence of high nonlinearity. Zhao et al [13] modeled a nonlinear extended state observer (NESO) for double-joint manipulator systems which is actuated by artificial muscles with a trajectory tracking control strategy. Further, a motion mechanism of PAM based on NESO is studied by considering dead-zones of the muscles with an adaptive control method [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One is based on the modification of the conventional linear controllers such as friction compensation-based linear controller, proportional-integral-derivative gain scheduling techniques and intelligent control-based controller [3][4][5]. To further enhance the achievable performance, another research effort has paid attention to the model-based nonlinear control strategies such as self-tuning control, model reference adaptive control, disturbance-observer-based control and adaptive robust control [6][7][8][9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%