2019
DOI: 10.1109/access.2019.2916472
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trajectory Tracking Control for a Boost Converter Based on the Differential Flatness Property

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By defining ̃ a1 = a1 −̂ a1 , ̃ b1 = b1 −̂ b1 and differentiating from Eqs. The most common method to determine these currents is using the equilibrium points of each converter (Gil-Antonio et al 2019). Thus, the PI controllers are not required.…”
Section: A1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By defining ̃ a1 = a1 −̂ a1 , ̃ b1 = b1 −̂ b1 and differentiating from Eqs. The most common method to determine these currents is using the equilibrium points of each converter (Gil-Antonio et al 2019). Thus, the PI controllers are not required.…”
Section: A1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proportional term K p of the PI voltage controller is designed to be high enough, so that the dynamic response is not slowed down. Thus, the control equation of the proposed IEBC method is derived as (6). With the high robustness of the PI controller, the steady-state errors of the output voltage due to the neglection of circuit energy losses can be eliminated.…”
Section: The Derivation Of Control Equation and Implementation Omentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a switch condition first have to determine and there is no significant improvement on the input variations or disturbances [3] [4]. Recently, to get superior static and dynamic performances, various control methods were developed, such as hysteresis control, slidingmode control, fuzzy control, etc [5][6][7][8][9][10]. As an attempt to obtain excellent performances, the law of energy conservation, which states that the total amount of energy in a system is constant, has been introduced into the control field.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As for the Objective 1), quite a few nonlinear control methods have been proposed to improve the transient performance and robustness of the DC/DC power converters, including flatness-based control [11], sliding-mode control [12], Lyapunov-based control [13], model predictive control [14] or passivity-based control [15]. All these typical well-developed control methods can achieve fast dynamic responses and high robustness properties.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results show that the steady-state errors under both methods can be eliminated. Nonlinear control methods, for example, flatness-based control [11], sliding-mode control [12], and model predictive control [14] for boost converter, Lyapunov-based control [13] and passivity-based control [19] for boost converter cascaded with LC filter, passivity-based control for boost and buck converters [15].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%