2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.aaspro.2015.12.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trajectory Planning with Obstacles on the Example of Tomato Harvest

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, these limitations include the path generation in fields with obstacles, in fields with un-even terrain, and in capacitated operations. Although there are existing methods for the generation of such paths (e.g., field with obstacles: [24,25], three-dimensional path planning: [26,27], capacitated operations [28,29]), there are optimization processes involved meaning that the generated paths can be also near-optimal solutions and thus biasing the objectiveness of the estimation of the field efficiency. In other words, the value of the estimated FTE will depend on the methodology followed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, these limitations include the path generation in fields with obstacles, in fields with un-even terrain, and in capacitated operations. Although there are existing methods for the generation of such paths (e.g., field with obstacles: [24,25], three-dimensional path planning: [26,27], capacitated operations [28,29]), there are optimization processes involved meaning that the generated paths can be also near-optimal solutions and thus biasing the objectiveness of the estimation of the field efficiency. In other words, the value of the estimated FTE will depend on the methodology followed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More specifically, the gray-level picture is obtained by the weighted average method, and the putative target is matched with the elliptic template. When the center of the elliptic template is located in the region obtained by the Otsu algorithm, this ellipse is determined to be a tomato [20] , otherwise it is not a tomato. The motion of Joint 1 and Joint 2 is planned in the two-dimensional C-space based on the critical collision angles, and that of Joint 3 is planned from the starting point to the target point according to the motion points of Joint 1.…”
Section: Four-wheel Independent Steering Chassismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Boryga et al 13 modeled and investigated the planning rectilinear-arc polynomial trajectory (PR-APT) approach for trajectory planning of a tomato harvesting mobile manipulator by considering few kinematic constraints like displacement, velocity and acceleration. To represent a trajectory, two rectilinear curve segments had been used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mirzaeinejad and Shafei 16 proposed a new solution which combines some prediction-based and G-A-based approaches for trajectory modeling and tracking control of a WMR. Each method discussed in literature [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] has its own limitations. Further, the conventional optimization methods [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] presented in the literature are not powerful enough to solve high-complexity robot trajectory optimization problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%