1991
DOI: 10.1109/41.87587
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trajectory control of robotic manipulators using neural networks

Abstract: AbsZruct-This paper presents a nonlinear compensator using neural networks for trajectory control of robotic manipulators. The adaptive capability of the neural network controller to compensate unstructured uncertainties is clarified. A model learning scheme is also proposed in this paper. The learning procedure is effective and efficient in learning the manipulator dynamics, and error convergence with untrained trajectories is fast.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
75
0
2

Year Published

1995
1995
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 210 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
75
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, advanced driver assistance systems may perfectly use this kind of system. In addition, an autonomous robot, and, in general, any kind of autonomous navigation system, may eventually benefit from the use of this cooperative, extremely fast, and reliable TNNs to make their navigation safer by detecting the contour of different possible objects that surround them [37], [38].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, advanced driver assistance systems may perfectly use this kind of system. In addition, an autonomous robot, and, in general, any kind of autonomous navigation system, may eventually benefit from the use of this cooperative, extremely fast, and reliable TNNs to make their navigation safer by detecting the contour of different possible objects that surround them [37], [38].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been some developments in the use of neural networks for the control purposes, Miller et al (1987); Miyamoto et al (1988); Ozaki et al (1991); Saad et al (1994). In general, neural network control design has two steps.…”
Section: Tracking Control Of the Joint Self-impact Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Maintenance and sensor failure detection was reported in [82], check valves operating in a nuclear power plant [57], [114], and vibration monitoring in rolling element bearings [2]. It was widely applied in feedback control [19], [40], [52], [59], [87], [89], [109], [110] and fault diagnosis of robotic systems [116]. This structure was also used in a temperature control system [63], [64], monitoring feed water flow rate and component thermal performance of pressurized water reactors [61], and fault diagnosis in a heat exchanger continuous stirred tank reactor system [102].…”
Section: A Mlpsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They can be classified into some major methods, such as supervised control, inverse control, neural adaptive control, back-propagation of utility (which is an extended method of a back-propagation through time) and adaptive critics (which is an extended method of reinforcement learning algorithm) [2]. MLP structures were used for digital current regulation of inverter drives [16], to predict trajectories in robotic environments [19], [40], [52], [73], [79], [87], [89], [110], to control turbo generators [117], to monitor feed water flow rate and component thermal performance of pressurized water reactors [61], to regulate temperature [64], and to predict natural gas consumption [65]. Dynamical versions of MLP networks were used to control a nonlinear dynamic model of a robot [60], [97], to control manufacturing cells [92], and to implement a programmable cascaded low-pass filter [101].…”
Section: Process Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%