Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
Green Grabbing: A New Appropriation of Nature
DOI: 10.9774/gleaf.9781315829654_14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trajectories of land acquisition and enclosure: development schemes, virtual land grabs, and green acquisitions in Indonesia’s Outer Islands

Abstract: While the size and speculative nature of land transactions in the wake of energy, food and climate crises have surprised observers, the reasons for partial implementation of many land developments remain largely unexamined. This contribution investigates trajectories of land acquisition and enclosure by analyzing four acquisition processes in Indonesia -those associated with rice, oil palm, Jatropha and carbon sequestration -considering their implications for comparative studies elsewhere. The paper finds that… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
48
1
2

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
48
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…So-called 'green grabbing conservation organizations' (green grab being a style of land grab to ostensibly pursue conservation or environmental outcomes as core objectives) have also perpetuated the notion that conservation can succeed in the long run in places where people continue to live in poverty [41][42][43]. This is contrary to evidence that while a population is living in poverty, they will continue to exert pressure on natural resources with negative conservation outcomes [44][45][46].…”
Section: Flawed Assumptionscontrasting
confidence: 49%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…So-called 'green grabbing conservation organizations' (green grab being a style of land grab to ostensibly pursue conservation or environmental outcomes as core objectives) have also perpetuated the notion that conservation can succeed in the long run in places where people continue to live in poverty [41][42][43]. This is contrary to evidence that while a population is living in poverty, they will continue to exert pressure on natural resources with negative conservation outcomes [44][45][46].…”
Section: Flawed Assumptionscontrasting
confidence: 49%
“…Kenyabur Baru is a frontier village, specifically an agricultural market frontier village [42]. Frontier and disputed areas are where pressures for deforestation and degradation are increasing, and control is often insecure and in conflict.…”
Section: A Forest At Stakementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This phenomenon of only partial implementation of plantation plans, or even no implementation at all, was not new. McCarthy et al [17] have situated the experiences with large Jatropha schemes in their historical context in Indonesia: many ambitious land use projects have led to unplanned results in the field, and failed projects have been succeeded by new initiatives. This history of large-scale land use projects also indicates that where projects have failed in terms of their original long-term objectives, some of the actors who have been involved might have benefitted for a limited short-term period.…”
Section: National Policies and Jatropha Projects In Sumbamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To answer these questions, a socio-legal approach was used [2,3], to analyze how law functions in society while taking a jatropha value chain as organizational unit of research. There can be various types of jatropha value chains, depending on the business model (e.g., whether production is for domestic use or export and the extent to which efforts are made to valorize side-products).…”
Section: Conceptual Framework and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%