“…Theoretical models (Tilman, , ; Goldberg, ; Gioria and Osborne, ; Goldberg et al., ) and field experimentations (Schoener, ; Goldberg and Barton, ; Wilson and Tilman, ; Mason et al., ) both suggest that competitive interactions have the largest negative fitness consequences for individuals when there is greater overlap in required limited resources or resource allocation strategies. WGD can result in differences in physiological processes (Schlaepfer et al., ; Grewell et al., ; Van Drunen and Husband, ), environmental tolerances (Maherali et al., ; Jamieson et al., ; Thompson et al., , ), and resource allocation strategies (Bales and Hersch‐Green, ), such that similar cytotypes may share more resource requirements or resource allocation strategies with each other than they do with dissimilar cytotypes. If cytotypes are ecologically differentiated in terms of their nutrient requirements, as is hypothesized here, it is expected that intra‐cytotype competition would be more intense than inter‐cytotype competition—mirroring the stronger effects of intraspecific competition than of interspecific competition frequently observed in natural populations (Adler et al., ).…”