2012
DOI: 10.1093/jpe/rts035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trait plasticity, not values, best corresponds with woodland plant success in novel and manipulated habitats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Baseline values of leaf traits under present-day climatic conditions did not predict how species performed under particular scenarios of climate change. However, we found that plasticity in leaf traits due to climate manipulations, or in some cases the lack of plasticity, was associated with changes in performance in response to our climate manipulations (see also Warren & Lake, 2012). Thus, our results provide strong experimental support for recent conjectures about trait plasticity having an important role in explaining performance under climate change (Nicotra et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Baseline values of leaf traits under present-day climatic conditions did not predict how species performed under particular scenarios of climate change. However, we found that plasticity in leaf traits due to climate manipulations, or in some cases the lack of plasticity, was associated with changes in performance in response to our climate manipulations (see also Warren & Lake, 2012). Thus, our results provide strong experimental support for recent conjectures about trait plasticity having an important role in explaining performance under climate change (Nicotra et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Relative distance plasticity indices (RDPIs) were comparable to those calculated for higher plant traits, also compared over a small number (2-3) of populations (e.g. Warren & Lake, 2013). The RDPIs differed between males and females in their allocation of energy to reproductive tissues, but not when considered relative to their respective dry-weights (relative reproductive investments, RRIs).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Both species likely contracted into patchy, isolated patches during the height of cotton farming in the southeastern USA (1920s), but whereas A. arifolium has recolonized recovering secondary forests, A. americana remains isolated. Habitat limitation does not seem to explain the patchiness because A. americana exhibits greater phenotypic flexibility and survival than A. arifolium when transplanted into novel local and regional habitats (Warren, , ; Warren & Bradford, ; Warren & Lake, ). Whereas dispersal generally is associated with long鈥恉istance colonization, the simple act of dispersing seeds away from parents is a critical demographic stage integral for population survival and so might explain A. americana's continuing patchy distribution (Kalisz et al ., ; Chlumsky et al ., ; Jones et al ., ; Montesinos et al ., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%