2019
DOI: 10.1002/lno.11189
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trait‐based analysis of subpolar North Atlantic phytoplankton and plastidic ciliate communities using automated flow cytometer

Abstract: Plankton are an extremely diverse and polyphyletic group, exhibiting a large range in morphological and physiological traits. Here, we apply automated optical techniques, provided by the pulse-shape recording automated flow cytometer-CytoSense-to investigate trait variability of phytoplankton and plastidic ciliates in Arctic and Atlantic waters of the subpolar North Atlantic. We used the bio-optical descriptors derived from the CytoSense (light scattering [forward and sideward] and fluorescence [red, yellow/gr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 96 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Whether NAAMES observations of small phytoplankton in the western North Atlantic, including multiple taxa never before documented in this environment, are due to physical differences between the western and eastern North Atlantic [68], ocean warming and higher atmospheric CO 2 concentrations [69,70], constraints of previously applied methodologies, or are a coincidental annual anomaly, is still to be determined. Of these explanations, which are not mutually exclusive, differences between the west and east Atlantic in eddy kinetic energy, mixed layer depth, photosynthetic active radiation and the influence of arctic water masses, have been proven by previous studies to affect composition and biomass of the phytoplankton blooms [67,71]. If our results are representative of the broader western North Atlantic, then they have major implications on current understanding of phytoplankton bloom impacts on regional carbon biogeochemistry.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…Whether NAAMES observations of small phytoplankton in the western North Atlantic, including multiple taxa never before documented in this environment, are due to physical differences between the western and eastern North Atlantic [68], ocean warming and higher atmospheric CO 2 concentrations [69,70], constraints of previously applied methodologies, or are a coincidental annual anomaly, is still to be determined. Of these explanations, which are not mutually exclusive, differences between the west and east Atlantic in eddy kinetic energy, mixed layer depth, photosynthetic active radiation and the influence of arctic water masses, have been proven by previous studies to affect composition and biomass of the phytoplankton blooms [67,71]. If our results are representative of the broader western North Atlantic, then they have major implications on current understanding of phytoplankton bloom impacts on regional carbon biogeochemistry.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…For example, the Amnis ImageStream (Luminex, Japan) is a flow cytometer that can take an image of every particle that passes through the machine's laser, which could aid in tackling problems such as bacterial chaining. Alternatively, there are cytometers that can provide data on the shape of the pulse generated from scanning a particle, such as the CytoSense (CytoBuoy, the Netherlands; 43,44). A pulse scan may provide more detail on particle morphology compared to recording a single value for each particle.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the data can contain distinct cell populations caused by differences in cell size, morphology, and autofluorescent properties (e.g., phytoplankton [ 45 ]) or due to the use of specific stains (e.g., a nucleic acid stain to detect nucleic acid populations in aquatic environments [ 46 ]). While these are routinely gated manually, cell population identification algorithms detect these automatically and therefore reduce the bias and analysis time inherent in manual gating procedures by experts ( 20 ).…”
Section: Cell Population Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%