2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsat.2015.05.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Training Substance Use Disorder Counselors in Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Depression: Development and Initial Exploration of an Online Training Program

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other reasons include lack of time and support for such training for those working in community organizations (Herschell, et al, 2010) and negative beliefs about EBTs (e.g., that they impair the therapeutic relationship, limit clinical decision making, are too manualized and thus robotic, and that they do not translate well outside of research the environment; (Curran, et al, 2015; Shafran, et al, 2009; Stewart, et al, 2012). Negative beliefs about certain components of treatment, such as fears that exposure therapy will cause clients harm, have also been identified (Deacon et al, 2013) and discredited by scientific evidence (see for a review (Olatunji, Deacon, & Abramowitz, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Other reasons include lack of time and support for such training for those working in community organizations (Herschell, et al, 2010) and negative beliefs about EBTs (e.g., that they impair the therapeutic relationship, limit clinical decision making, are too manualized and thus robotic, and that they do not translate well outside of research the environment; (Curran, et al, 2015; Shafran, et al, 2009; Stewart, et al, 2012). Negative beliefs about certain components of treatment, such as fears that exposure therapy will cause clients harm, have also been identified (Deacon et al, 2013) and discredited by scientific evidence (see for a review (Olatunji, Deacon, & Abramowitz, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Negative beliefs about certain components of treatment, such as fears that exposure therapy will cause clients harm, have also been identified (Deacon et al, 2013) and discredited by scientific evidence (see for a review (Olatunji, Deacon, & Abramowitz, 2009). Curran et al (2015) described several approaches for overcoming these biases, including providing clinicians with empirical evidence to counter these beliefs and listening to and working with clinicians to flexibly integrate EBTs within their current practice approach.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Despite potential advantages in scalability and access, inconsistent findings have been reported to date on clinician's actual use or acceptance of online training. Some clinicians report preferences for online training in comparison to face-to-face alternatives (Hubley, Woodcock, Dimeff, & Dimidjian, 2015), or training formats that impact less on work or personal time (Curran et al, 2015;Herschell, Lindhiem, Kogan, Celedonia, & Stein, 2014). Some PTSDoriented, online training programs have had wide circulation and dissemination, particularly:…”
Section: Role Of Technology In Evidence-based Training and Implementamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Five of these provided written manuals to a control group (Henggeler et al, 2013;Larson et al, 2013;Rawson et al, 2013;Sholomskas & Carroll, 2006;Sholomskas et al, 2005), two of the RCTs studied post-training support and offered no resources to the control group (Carpenter et al, 2012Smith et al 2012, and one study used a delayed training group as a control (Weingardt, Villafranca, & Levin, 2005). Of those studies that were not RCTs, one was a randomised trial comparing face-to-face and online training (Clancy & Taylor, 2016); two were randomised trials comparing different online training formats (Leykin, Cucciare, & Weingardt, 2011;Weingardt, Cucciare, Bellotti, & Lai, 2009); two were prototype, pilot or feasibility studies (Larson et al, 2009;Matejkowski, Dugosh, Clements, & Festinger, 2015); one was a crosssectional survey of substance misuse staff (Aletraris, Shelton, & Roman, 2015); one was a longitudinal study of online learning (Shafer, Rhode, & Chong, 2004), and one was a qualitative study reporting participant experiences of online learning (Curran et al, 2015).…”
Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%