Training Social Problem‐solving Skill to Reduce Maladaptive Behaviours in Intellectual Disability Groups: The Influence of Individual Difference Factors

Abstract

A critical review of the literature relevant to social problem-solving skills training (SPSST) in individuals with intellectual disabilities concluded that although there is some evidence that training may be effective, the evidence is weak. It is suggested that little is known about factors which may moderate the effectiveness of training; in particular the impact of age, general intellectual ability and place of residence (community or institution). A five-stage view of the social problem-solving process is offered as a means for planning and evaluating SPSST programmes, and detailed outcome criteria are proposed for assessing the effectiveness of training. A group (n = 29) of adults with intellectual disabilities was given SPSST. Comparisons were made with an untrained control group (n = 17) matched to the trained group on age, general intelligence, adaptive and maladaptive behaviour. A statistically significant improvement was found in the trained group ( p < 0.01), but not in the control group (NS), on degree of maladaptive behaviour as rated by independent judges. Improvement occurred only in trainees resident in the community but was not influenced by age or level of general intelligence. Furthermore, reductions in maladaptive behaviour were associated with improvements in some but not all social problem-solving skills.

Intellectual Disabilities and Neglectful Parenting: Preliminary Findings on the Role of Cognition in Parenting Risk

“…Cognitive enhancements to interventions with maltreating abusive parents (Azar, 1989; Kolko, 1996) and prevention programs with at risk parents have shown some effectiveness(Bugental et al, 2002; Sanders et al, 2004) and have been adapted in preliminary ways to PID (Heinz & Grant, 2003; Tymchuk, 2006). This would also extend newer work with ID adults attempting to use cognitive treatment strategies (e.g., dual diagnosis with anxiety, Dagnan & Jahoda, 2006; social skills, Loumidis & Hill, 1997; Rusch, Morgan, Martin, Riva & Agran, 1985; anger management, Taylor, Novaco, Gillmer, Robertson & Thorne, 2005). …”

Chronic Neglect and Services Without Borders: A Guiding Model for Social Service Enhancement to Address the Needs of Parents With Intellectual Disabilities

“…In addition to behavioral work, cognitive strategies have been applied in other areas of functioning with adults with cognitive challenges (e.g., dual diagnosis with anxiety, Dagnan & Jahoda, 2006); social skills, (Loumidis & Hill, 1997; Rusch & et al, 1985); anger management, (Taylor, Novaco, Gillmer, Robertson, & Thorne, 2005). Cognitive strategies have been used recently to enhance parenting work (Barmish & Kendall, 2005; Costin, Lichte, Hill-Smith, Vance, & Luk, 2004; Johnston, 1996; Stern & Azar, 1998).…”

Victimisation and Social Vulnerability of Adults with Intellectual Disability: Revisiting Wilson and Brewer (1992) and Responding to Updated Research

“…Effectiveness was generally limited with increases in knowledge, not necessarily leading to behaviour change. More general training targeted at improving social problem-solving has produced some promising results (e.g., Loumidis & Hill, 1997) although the extent to which this will ultimately reduce vulnerability remains unclear.…”