2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2015.03.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Training program for the management of two obstetric emergencies within a French perinatal care network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nine of the programs evaluated included vaginal breech birth within a general obstetric emergencies course . Six programs evaluated taught vaginal breech birth as an advanced clinical skill, either on its own or along with a small number of other advanced skills . Two programs evaluated included one‐to‐one support in clinical practice as an explicit part of the training, after theoretical and practical training .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Nine of the programs evaluated included vaginal breech birth within a general obstetric emergencies course . Six programs evaluated taught vaginal breech birth as an advanced clinical skill, either on its own or along with a small number of other advanced skills . Two programs evaluated included one‐to‐one support in clinical practice as an explicit part of the training, after theoretical and practical training .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eight studies reported outcomes related to objective assessments of skill and/or knowledge . Change in knowledge was assessed using scenario‐related or multiple choice questions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…An attempt was made to obtain the complete study behind the conference report in order to evaluate methodological rigour; this was not provided, but the conference report contained a clear table of relevant information which was included. The studies reviewed included two randomised controlled trials (15,16), four standardised observational assessments (17)(18)(19)(20), five self-evaluation surveys (21)(22)(23)(24)(25), two exploratory analyses using scenario based structured questions (26,27), two before-and-after outcomes studies (28,29), a mixed methods process evaluation with the predominate methodology being qualitative (30), and descriptive report (31). Several of the studies used more than one method of evaluation, and gathered both quantitative and qualitative data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%