2020
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3625265
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Training Policies in Chile: A Decision-making Effectiveness Comparison

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the long run, in the context of increasing the labour market's polarisation, any job that does not require university education is rewarded at a worse rate the human capital than those jobs in the professional job market. A consequence deriving from the previous situation is that certifications or training have little value over time (Didier, 2020), making it challenging to translate other certification and occupational licensing experiences used in industrialised countries.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the long run, in the context of increasing the labour market's polarisation, any job that does not require university education is rewarded at a worse rate the human capital than those jobs in the professional job market. A consequence deriving from the previous situation is that certifications or training have little value over time (Didier, 2020), making it challenging to translate other certification and occupational licensing experiences used in industrialised countries.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The weak state participation in the labour market in Chile can be attributed to the prevalent neoliberal development model (Didier, 2020; Heiss, 2021). This model often leads to indicator pressures, centralised bureaucracies and duplications of actions, among other issues.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the same time, the assessments performed gave heterogeneous results, from negative to positive effects. Didier (2020) performed an evaluation of the complete system by comparing the funding strategies with the outcomes in terms of job‐training skill premium, showing that the different decisionmakers represented by the alternatives for financing and the training supply have different rates of effectiveness. The data used was constrained before 2010, and did not consider the short‐term effects of the educational system expansion since 2005 and its effects on the labor market since 2010.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%