1986
DOI: 10.1016/0147-1767(86)90001-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Training issues in cross-cultural orientation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among scholars, there is a large discussion on what intercultural sensitivity means, implies and embraces [12]- [14]. The work of Bennett and others [15]- [18] provides a wealth of literature on intercultural sensitivity and its historical development.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among scholars, there is a large discussion on what intercultural sensitivity means, implies and embraces [12]- [14]. The work of Bennett and others [15]- [18] provides a wealth of literature on intercultural sensitivity and its historical development.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The models The acculturation model The theory of acculturation represented in the first model (Figure 2) also addresses some essential issues that have been brought up by intercultural trainers. For example, Martin (1986) regrets the lack of conceptual clarity about what constitutes cross-cultural orientation and which outcomes should be considered. In response to this, the model offers a basic distinction between psychological and sociocultural adjustments and suggests that adjustment outcomes can be integrated with training objectives.…”
Section: Journal Of Manpower 216 498mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Martin (1986) regrets the lack of conceptual clarity about what constitutes cross-cultural orientation and which outcomes should be considered. In response to this, the model offers a basic distinction between psychological and sociocultural adjustments and suggests that adjustment outcomes can be integrated with training objectives.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other researchers argue that additional factors may influence or even override more temporal considerations as suggested by U-curve and W-curve hypothesis proponents: attitudinal, personal (Adier, 1981(Adier, , 1986, situational factors (Kim, 1988;Rohrlich & Martin, 1991) and the type of relationship under consideration (Martin, 1984(Martin, , 1986.…”
Section: Characteristics Of Reentrymentioning
confidence: 99%