Training-induced hypervolemia

Green, Howard J.; Jones, L.; Hughson, R. L.; Painter, Doug C.; Farrance, B.

doi:10.1249/00005768-198706000-00003

Cited by 49 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Here, peak oxygen uptake was improved after 9 weeks with 3 weekly sessions of either Circuit HIIT (10.1%) or Circuit combined (4.4%). The overall greater response of VO 2peak to high-intensity exercise can be explained by better central adaptation, including augmented plasma and blood volumes (Convertino et al, 1980; Green et al, 1987; Graham et al, 2016) with elevated stroke volume (Green et al, 1990; Goodman et al, 2005). …”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In contrast, low-intensity endurance exercise is known to augment plasma volume (Green et al, 1987, 1990), muscular blood flow (Coyle, 1999), and capillary and mitochondrial densities (Hoppeler and Weibel, 2000) thereby improving peak oxygen uptake (Hickson et al, 1981). Improved cardiorespiratory fitness (e.g., maximum oxygen uptake) has been associated with improved health and less premature death (Bouchard et al, 2015).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Functional High-Intensity Circuit Training Improves Body Composition, Peak Oxygen Uptake, Strength, and Alters Certain Dimensions of Quality of Life in Overweight Women

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The effects of circuit-like functional high-intensity training (CircuitHIIT) alone or in combination with high-volume low-intensity exercise (Circuitcombined) on selected cardio-respiratory and metabolic parameters, body composition, functional strength and the quality of life of overweight women were compared. In this single-center, two-armed randomized, controlled study, overweight women performed 9-weeks (3 sessions·wk−1) of either CircuitHIIT (n = 11), or Circuitcombined (n = 8). Peak oxygen uptake and perception of physical pain were increased to a greater extent (p < 0.05) by CircuitHIIT, whereas Circuitcombined improved perception of general health more (p < 0.05). Both interventions lowered body mass, body-mass-index, waist-to-hip ratio, fat mass, and enhanced fat-free mass; decreased ratings of perceived exertion during submaximal treadmill running; improved the numbers of push-ups, burpees, one-legged squats, and 30-s skipping performed, as well as the height of counter-movement jumps; and improved physical and social functioning, role of physical limitations, vitality, role of emotional limitations, and mental health to a similar extent (all p < 0.05). Either forms of these multi-stimulating, circuit-like, multiple-joint training can be employed to improve body composition, selected variables of functional strength, and certain dimensions of quality of life in overweight women. However, CircuitHIIT improves peak oxygen uptake to a greater extent, but with more perception of pain, whereas Circuitcombined results in better perception of general health.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Functional High-Intensity Circuit Training Improves Body Composition, Peak Oxygen Uptake, Strength, and Alters Certain Dimensions of Quality of Life in Overweight Women

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In moderately trained persons, HVT improves metabolic and hemodynamic adaptations over 3 days (Green et al, 1987, 1990; Coyle, 1999). However, a greater volume of training (~3–5 weeks with 3–5 sessions·wk −1 ) is needed to improve VO 2peak (Laursen and Jenkins, 2002).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Polarized training has greater impact on key endurance variables than threshold, high intensity, or high volume training

2014

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Endurance athletes integrate four conditioning concepts in their training programs: high-volume training (HVT), “threshold-training” (THR), high-intensity interval training (HIIT) and a combination of these aforementioned concepts known as polarized training (POL). The purpose of this study was to explore which of these four training concepts provides the greatest response on key components of endurance performance in well-trained endurance athletes.Methods: Forty eight runners, cyclists, triathletes, and cross-country skiers (peak oxygen uptake: (VO2peak): 62.6 ± 7.1 mL·min−1·kg−1) were randomly assigned to one of four groups performing over 9 weeks. An incremental test, work economy and a VO2peak tests were performed. Training intensity was heart rate controlled.Results: POL demonstrated the greatest increase in VO2peak (+6.8 ml·min·kg−1 or 11.7%, P < 0.001), time to exhaustion during the ramp protocol (+17.4%, P < 0.001) and peak velocity/power (+5.1%, P < 0.01). Velocity/power at 4 mmol·L−1 increased after POL (+8.1%, P < 0.01) and HIIT (+5.6%, P < 0.05). No differences in pre- to post-changes of work economy were found between the groups. Body mass was reduced by 3.7% (P < 0.001) following HIIT, with no changes in the other groups. With the exception of slight improvements in work economy in THR, both HVT and THR had no further effects on measured variables of endurance performance (P > 0.05).Conclusion: POL resulted in the greatest improvements in most key variables of endurance performance in well-trained endurance athletes. THR or HVT did not lead to further improvements in performance related variables.

show abstract

“…Luetkemeier and Thomas (1994) reported a reduction in the time to reach a target work goal, and an increase in average cycling power output following 3 days of submaximal cycling (92.9 min at 68% V O 2max ). Several of the studies conducted by Green and colleagues involving relatively short‐term training have resulted in significant increases in exercise variables, including an increase in V O 2max of 17.2% (Green et al, 1991) and an increase in peak power output of 23 W (Green et al, 1987b). However, these changes are not consistent with a third study (Green, Jones, & Painter, 1990), in which this group found no such change in V O 2max .…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Exercise‐induced hypervolaemia has been well documented following both long‐term (Carroll et al, 1995; Green, Sutton, Coates, Ali, & Jones, 1991; Oscai, Williams, & Hertig, 1968) and relatively short‐term training (Green et al, 1984; Green, Jones, Hughson, Painter, & Farrance, 1987b), and reductions in plasma volume have also been observed following detraining (Coyle, Hemmert, & Coggan, 1986). Several experiments have shown that a short training period involving high‐intensity exercise may result in significant changes in plasma volume.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

One session of interval work does not alter VO_2max, peak power or plasma volume

Hodges

Sporer

Lane

et al. 2010

European Journal of Sport Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We examined the effect of one high-intensity cycling workout on aerobic capacity (VO 2max ), peak cycling power, and estimated change in plasma volume on subsequent days. Eight healthy males (age 029.595.3 years, height01.8190.09 m, mass 081.597.5 kg) visited the laboratory on three occasions. The first visit (D1) included baseline measures of cycling VO 2max , haematocrit, and haemoglobin. Following a brief rest, the participants performed a high-intensity cycling workout of six 30-s cycling intervals (modelled on the Wingate cycle test) with each repetition separated by 3 min rest. The final two visits (D2 and D3) included identical measures as the first visit and occurred 48 and 96 h after the interval workout. No significant differences were found for VO 2max (53.495.3, 53.796.7, and 53.796.2 ml × kg (1 × min (1 ), peak power (3869 35, 384935, and 389935 W) or estimated change in plasma volume [(0.898.5% (D1ÁD2), 1.5911.5% (D2ÁD3), and (1.699.6% (D1ÁD3)] between any of the three test days. Our results show that one short-term high-intensity cycling workout does not alter VO 2max , peak power or estimated change in plasma volume on subsequent days, and is therefore unlikely to benefit or hinder performance.

show abstract

Training-induced hypervolemia

Cited by 49 publications

References 0 publications

Functional High-Intensity Circuit Training Improves Body Composition, Peak Oxygen Uptake, Strength, and Alters Certain Dimensions of Quality of Life in Overweight Women

Functional High-Intensity Circuit Training Improves Body Composition, Peak Oxygen Uptake, Strength, and Alters Certain Dimensions of Quality of Life in Overweight Women

Polarized training has greater impact on key endurance variables than threshold, high intensity, or high volume training

One session of interval work does not alter VO_2max, peak power or plasma volume

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About

Training-induced hypervolemia

Cited by 49 publications

References 0 publications

Functional High-Intensity Circuit Training Improves Body Composition, Peak Oxygen Uptake, Strength, and Alters Certain Dimensions of Quality of Life in Overweight Women

Functional High-Intensity Circuit Training Improves Body Composition, Peak Oxygen Uptake, Strength, and Alters Certain Dimensions of Quality of Life in Overweight Women

Polarized training has greater impact on key endurance variables than threshold, high intensity, or high volume training

One session of interval work does not alter VO2max, peak power or plasma volume

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About

One session of interval work does not alter VO_2max, peak power or plasma volume