Training in Family Therapy: Dealing with Aspects of the Invariant Method

The Milan method—quo vadis?

“…It is perhaps not surprising that most of the writing in relation to the work of Cecchin and Boscolo has been done by others, since they occupy themselves primarily with teaching and do not often publish independently, while Selvini Palazzoli and Prata have continued to publish prolifically (e.g. Cronen et al, 1982Keeney, 1982Keeney, , 1983Deissler and Gester, 1983;Viaro andLeonardi, 1983, 1986;Bogdan, 1984a, b;Matthews, 1984;Miller, 1984;Speed, 1984Speed, , 1985Van Trommel, 1984;Campbell and Draper, 1985;Castellucci et al, 1985;Colapinto, 1985;Hoffman I 985;Efrann and Lukens, I 985;Fruggeri et al, I 985;Penn, I 985;Schmidt and Trenkle, 1985;Tomm, 1985Tomm, , I 987a, 6, 1988Anderson et al, I 986;Bennun, 1986;Blom, I 986;Lipchik and De Shazer, 1986;Fleuridas et al, 1986;Mendez et al, 1986;Sanders, 1986;Wynne et al, 1986;Anderson, 1987;Coleman, 1987;Durkin, 1987;Gelcer, 1987;Golann 1987Golann , 1988Jones, 1987;Lane and Russell, 1987; McNamee I 987, I 988; McNamee and Fruggeri, I 987; Meyerstein and Compass, I 987; Goolishian and Anderson, 1988).…”