2019 International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition (ICDAR) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/icdar.2019.00209
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Training-Free and Segmentation-Free Word Spotting using Feature Matching and Query Expansion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In manuscript research, it is often the case that words are parts of handwritten sentences on degraded writing supports such as parchment, palm leaves or papyri. Most segmentation-free word-spotting methods have been evaluated on texture-free paper with no or very limited degradation and a dedicated training set of annotated data [11,[14][15][16].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In manuscript research, it is often the case that words are parts of handwritten sentences on degraded writing supports such as parchment, palm leaves or papyri. Most segmentation-free word-spotting methods have been evaluated on texture-free paper with no or very limited degradation and a dedicated training set of annotated data [11,[14][15][16].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These extracted features are typically clustered or used to train classifiers in most of these methods [12,14,15], or they are directly matched to the features of test images [10,11]. The need for "training-free" methods was recently highlighted [16] in order to cope with the lack of labelled samples for the task of segmentation-free word-spotting.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of convolutional neural networks [ 23 , 24 ] increased the performance of word spotting systems but these networks need a training set with a large amount of annotated data for being trained. Many solutions have been proposed for improving the word spotting performance without increasing the size of the training set: sample selection [ 25 ], data augmentation [ 23 ], transfer learning [ 26 , 27 ], training on synthetic data [ 22 , 28 ] and relaxed feature matching [ 29 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the following, we will discuss some basic technologies involved during the preprocessing step. [4, 41, 91, 92, 99-101, 105-115, 117, 118, 144, 145, 147, 148, 150, 155, 159] conditions [36, 160, 163, 165, 166, 168-170, 172-177, 177-180] Learning-free or [51-56, 58, 61, 62, 64, 67, 78, 84, 85, 88, 90-92, 95-98, 102, 103, 105] annotation-free [114-116, 118, 123-129, 132, 133, 136, 138, 147, 148, 150, 151, 154, 157, 159] methods [161,163,164,168,173,174,176,177] Segmentation-free [27, 54, 55, 58, 59, 61, 70, 72, 73, 84-86, 88, 90, 95, 96, 102, 116, 129, 148, 154] methods [156,168,170,172,[175][176][177]] Out-of-vocabulary [29,31,32,34,37,43,50,57,59,63,66,68,69,71,72,75,76,79,82,83,87] (OOV) KWS for [3, 4, 100-102, 104, 120, 125, 144, 150, 153, 156, 159, 160, 165, 166, 169, 175] QBS scenario [36,172,…”
Section: Basic Document Image Analysis Technologies Involvedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Howe [78] employs the method proposed in [193] which optimizes a global energy function based on the Laplacian operator upon the local likelihood of foreground and background labels, the Canny edge detection to identify likely discontinuities and a graph cut implementation to find the minimum energy solution of the objective function. Hast, as well as Vats et al [86,168] propose a background noise removal using a simple two band-pass filtering approach, as proposed in [194]. A high frequency band-pass filter is used to separate the fine detailed text from the background, whereas a low frequency band-pass filter is used for masking and noise removal.…”
Section: Binarizationmentioning
confidence: 99%