2009
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-03798-6_16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Training for Task Specific Keypoint Detection

Abstract: In this paper, we show that a better performance can be achieved by training a keypoint detector to only find those points that are suitable to the needs of the given task. We demonstrate our approach in an urban environment, where the keypoint detector should focus on stable man-made structures and ignore objects that undergo natural changes such as vegetation and clouds. We use Wald-Boost learning with task specific training samples in order to train a keypoint detector with this capability. We show that our… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Repeatability is also considered in the extended version FAST-ER [31], but it did not play a significant role. [38] trained the Wald-Boost classifier [36] to learn keypoints with high repeatability on a pre-aligned training set, and then filter out an initial set of keypoints according to the score of the classifier. Their method, called TaSK, is probably the most related to our method in the sense that they use pre-aligned images to build the training set.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Repeatability is also considered in the extended version FAST-ER [31], but it did not play a significant role. [38] trained the Wald-Boost classifier [36] to learn keypoints with high repeatability on a pre-aligned training set, and then filter out an initial set of keypoints according to the score of the classifier. Their method, called TaSK, is probably the most related to our method in the sense that they use pre-aligned images to build the training set.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By additionally introducing locations from those images where these stable points were not originally detected into the training set, TILDE outperforms DoG in terms of repeatability. TaSK [16] and LIFT [19] also detects anchor points based on similar strategies. The downside of such approaches is that the performance of the learned detector is dependent on the anchor detector used, i.e for certain transformations the learned detector can also reflect the poor performance of the anchor detector.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach leads to interesting results, although it uses a WaldBoost classifier instead of CNNs. Another approach tunes for specific tasks such as detecting keypoints from man-made structures [24]. Other machine learning approaches include using Genetic Programming [25], and learning linear filters [19] where the lack of non-linearity makes it more suited for very specific tasks.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%