Training Decision-Makers: GEODESIGN Workshop Paving the Way for New Urban Agenda

Scorza, Francesco

doi:10.1007/978-3-030-58811-3_22

Cited by 22 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 18 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The NUA also represents a commitment to a democratic development of countries and a driver for social enhancement in the respect of environment and urbanization. It claims themes such as equity, safety and resilience, as the prior focuses mainly on developing countries and in urban areas [58,59].…”

Section: The New Urban Agenda (Nua) Perspectivementioning

confidence: 99%

Comparing Impact Evaluation Evidence of EU and Local Development Policies with New Urban Agenda Themes: The Agri Valley Case in Basilicata (Italy)

Pontrandolfi

Dastoli

2021

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The European Union’s Cohesion Policy is the most important structural policy in terms of financial commitment, geographical size and time frame, aimed at redistributing wealth between regions and countries, to stimulate growth in areas whose development is lagging behind. The reach of the investments prompted the EU Commission to promote an impact evaluation of the European Structural Funds (SF); however, the impact evaluation of EU programs is almost neglected in the Italian regions. This paper is based on the results developed within the RI.P.R.O.VA.RE project and is aimed at defining an impact evaluation of EU SF and other regional funds, based on evidence derived from the analysis of a specific case study in the Agri Valley area (Basilicata, Italy). To develop the impact evaluation process, the euro amounts of all the individual policies organized according to the themes of the New Urban Agenda (NUA), the impact indicators and the trend for the municipalities are considered together, in order to obtain an overall trend for the entire case study area. An important result is achieved above all in the methodological approach to impact evaluation: the municipal territorial scale is taken into account; the maps illustrate the use of resources; regardless of the type of funding source since there is a comparison between the priority axes of the funds with the NUA issues; and indicators are developed with open data available at a national level. This experiment makes it possible to detect that, even in the face of significant investments, some substantial aspects that are part of the policy objectives remain unchanged or even worsen.

show abstract

Section: The New Urban Agenda (Nua) Perspectivementioning

confidence: 99%

Comparing Impact Evaluation Evidence of EU and Local Development Policies with New Urban Agenda Themes: The Agri Valley Case in Basilicata (Italy)

Pontrandolfi

Dastoli

2021

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Conventional planning approaches are no longer suited to cope with such multi-dimensionality since they frequently fail to consider the issues endorsed by different stakeholders interested in the planning process [3]. As cities become increasingly complex, planning methods that encourage collaboration among stakeholders are needed to reach a consensus [4][5][6][7] in order to pursue the goals of the Agenda 2030 to make cities more liveable through a shared vision of integral sustainability [8].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Collaborative and Sustainable Strategies Through Geodesign: The Case Study of Bacoli

Somma

Campagna

Canfield³

et al. 2022

Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2022 Workshops

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The geodesign framework has supported stakeholder engagement in policy-making and planning with its innovative, practical, operational, fast, and participatory tools for a long time. Although geodesign has provided practitioners with systematic and technologically sound solutions for sustainability problems within the International Geodesign Collaboration (IGC) network, a new concept of connectivity among neighbouring cities and the regeneration of landscapes should be more stressed by the participatory workshops. The paper proposes using geodesign system thinking to spark cooperation between Academia and Public Authorities to foster integrated, spatially explicit, and strategic planning. The experimentation presented in this paper aims at providing recommendations for sustainable design with a particular focus on local problems linked to accessibility and reclamation. The peninsula of the city of Bacoli (Italy) has been selected as a best-fit case study for investigating these dynamics by involving a working group of professors, researchers, PhD candidates, and students from the Second Level Master in Sustainable Planning and Design of Port Areas of the University of Naples Federico II, along with professionals, citizens, and policy-makers belonging to the Municipality. The workshop experience has demonstrated how collaborative processes between people with different backgrounds and interests can elicit preferences and identify relationships among the recovery of systems connected to landscape regeneration and accessibility infrastructures.

show abstract

Security and Resilience in Small Centres of Inland Areas

Dastoli

Pontrandolfi

2021

Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Training Decision-Makers: GEODESIGN Workshop Paving the Way for New Urban Agenda

Cited by 22 publications

References 18 publications

Comparing Impact Evaluation Evidence of EU and Local Development Policies with New Urban Agenda Themes: The Agri Valley Case in Basilicata (Italy)

Comparing Impact Evaluation Evidence of EU and Local Development Policies with New Urban Agenda Themes: The Agri Valley Case in Basilicata (Italy)

Collaborative and Sustainable Strategies Through Geodesign: The Case Study of Bacoli

Security and Resilience in Small Centres of Inland Areas

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About