2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2019.02.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Training convolutional neural networks to estimate turbulent sub-grid scale reaction rates

Abstract: This work presents a new approach for premixed turbulent combustion modeling based on convolutional neural networks (CNN). We first propose a framework to reformulate the problem of subgrid flame surface density estimation as a machine learning task.Data needed to train the CNN is produced by direct numerical simulations (DNS) of a premixed turbulent flame stabilized in a slot-burner configuration. A CNN inspired from a U-Net architecture is designed and trained on the DNS fields to estimate sub-grid scale wri… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
68
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 142 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
(55 reference statements)
0
68
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As discussed in the recent review by Duraisamy et al, 2 there have been several studies aimed at using machine learning to model turbulent flows, especially in the context of Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) simulations. 3,4 Other applications to modelling the near-wall region of turbulent flows were reported by Milano and Koumoutsakos, 5 while Lapeyre et al 6 and Beck et al 7 have documented the possibility of using machine learning in designing subgrid-scale (SGS) models for large-eddy simulation (LES). Machine learning has also been applied to flow control, 8,9 development of low-dimensional models, 10 generation of inflow conditions 11 or structure identification in two-dimensional decaying turbulence, 12 and as discussed by Kutz 13 DNNs will progressively be more widely used in fluid mechanics in the coming years.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As discussed in the recent review by Duraisamy et al, 2 there have been several studies aimed at using machine learning to model turbulent flows, especially in the context of Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) simulations. 3,4 Other applications to modelling the near-wall region of turbulent flows were reported by Milano and Koumoutsakos, 5 while Lapeyre et al 6 and Beck et al 7 have documented the possibility of using machine learning in designing subgrid-scale (SGS) models for large-eddy simulation (LES). Machine learning has also been applied to flow control, 8,9 development of low-dimensional models, 10 generation of inflow conditions 11 or structure identification in two-dimensional decaying turbulence, 12 and as discussed by Kutz 13 DNNs will progressively be more widely used in fluid mechanics in the coming years.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Artificial neural networks (ANNs) were found accurate, and both CPU and memory efficient [18,19]. Along similar lines, convolutional neural networks (CNNs), which were originally developed for analyzing visual representations [20], have been introduced in turbulent combustion modeling for direct deconvolution of the filtered progress variable [21], for modeling the unresolved flame surface wrinkling [22] and for the direct reconstruction of unresolved sources and fluxes from mesh-resolved quantities in large-eddy simulation (LES) [23]. Compared to ANNs, CNNs reduce the number of connections per layer to stack more of them efficiently, thus increasing the depth of the neural network.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data driven approaches have also been coupled with principal component analysis for developing closure models in turbulent combustion using experimental multi-scalar measurements [29] and for building digital-twins to progress towards furnace control [30]. Along similar lines, convolutional neural networks (CNN), based on image-like treatment of the thermochemical fields, were shown useful to tackle the modeling of turbulent flames [31][32][33] and their control [34].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%