2018
DOI: 10.1089/heq.2018.0043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Training Community Members in Public Health Research: Development and Implementation of a Community Participatory Research Pilot Project

Abstract: Purpose: Community-based training in public health research can build capacity for community-based participatory research (CBPR) and foster health partnerships between academics and stakeholders. We describe a community-academic partnership developed from a 15-week program, the Community Research Fellows Training (CRFT), designed to increase research literacy and facilitate equitable relationships in community/researcher collaborations and partnerships. The article provides a description of a community and fac… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Research literacy is a key component of co-production, because knowledge increases parity and participation [7,18,42,43]. Different levels of understanding were evident across all groups, and there were different levels of PPI and research participation experience amongst contributors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research literacy is a key component of co-production, because knowledge increases parity and participation [7,18,42,43]. Different levels of understanding were evident across all groups, and there were different levels of PPI and research participation experience amongst contributors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All program components were developed using community-based participatory research principles. 8 Participants, course content, and schedule were all informed by the CBO pilot course participants.…”
Section: Methods: Program Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While our project team strived to share power, the disparities in educational and economic opportunities made it difficult to consistently execute shared power and decision making and sustained the power gap between the researchers and the lead partner. In order to bridge the divide in content knowledge and technical skills, some studies cite giving nonresearch partners access to electronic libraries accompanied by literature search tutorials, or training partners in other research‐related topics (Komaie et al., 2018; Rockler et al., 2019). Such guidance presumes literacy, administrative skills, and technology access on the part of community partners that were not present in this case.…”
Section: Lessons Learnedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As researchers, we need to further investigate how we can support an emerging community's journey to equitable research partnership and participation. Some studies have addressed this issue through research training programs for community members (Battaglia et al., 2019; Komaie et al., 2018; Rockler et al., 2019). Though these programs provide a helpful foundation for community member training, these programs do not address the particular needs of partnerships with emerging immigrant communities.…”
Section: Conclusion/implications For Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%