Training community healthcare workers on the use of information and communication technologies: a randomised controlled trial of traditional versus blended learning in Malawi, Africa

Abstract

BackgroundDespite the increasing uptake of information and communication technologies (ICT) within healthcare services across developing countries, community healthcare workers (CHWs) have limited knowledge to fully utilise computerised clinical systems and mobile apps. The ‘Introduction to Information and Communication Technology and eHealth’ course was developed with the aim to provide CHWs in Malawi, Africa, with basic knowledge and computer skills to use digital solutions in healthcare delivery. The course was delivered using a traditional and a blended learning approach.MethodsTwo questionnaires were developed and tested for face validity and reliability in a pilot course with 20 CHWs. Those were designed to measure CHWs’ knowledge of and attitudes towards the use of ICT, before and after each course, as well as their satisfaction with each learning approach. Following validation, a randomised controlled trial was conducted to assess the effectiveness of the two learning approaches. A total of 40 CHWs were recruited, stratified by position, gender and computer experience, and allocated to the traditional or blended learning group using block randomisation. Participants completed the baseline and follow-up questionnaires before and after each course to assess the impact of each learning approach on their knowledge, attitudes, and satisfaction. Per-item, pre-post and between-group, mean differences for each approach were calculated using paired and unpaired t-tests, respectively. Per-item, between-group, satisfaction scores were compared using unpaired t-tests.ResultsScores across all scales improved after attending the traditional and blended learning courses. Self-rated ICT knowledge was significantly improved in both groups with significant differences between groups in seven domains. However, actual ICT knowledge scores were similar across groups. There were no significant differences between groups in attitudinal gains. Satisfaction with the course was generally high in both groups. However, participants in the blended learning group found it more difficult to follow the content of the course.ConclusionsThis study shows that there is no difference between blended and traditional learning in the acquisition of actual ICT knowledge among community healthcare workers in developing countries. Given the human resource constraints in remote resource-poor areas, the blended learning approach may present an advantageous alternative to traditional learning.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1186/s12909-018-1175-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Comparing the effectiveness of a hybrid and in-person courses of wheelchair service provision knowledge: A controlled quasi-experimental study in India and Mexico

“…The Hybrid and In-person training interventions had a statistically significant influence on the total Basic Test score when comparing post- and pre-test scores (p<0.0001) which make both interventions effective in increasing basic level wheelchair service knowledge. These results are consistent with other studies conducted in LMICs in which blended learning interventions proved to be as effective as in-person interventions [20, 24, 41–43]. However, the In-person group experienced, on average, larger effects on the total test scores and on the subgroup analysis.…”

Development and evaluation of a digital, community-based intervention to reduce noncommunicable disease risk in a low-resource urban setting in Malaysia: a research protocol

“…The digital health needs assessment survey was informed by best practice guidelines from the WHO and other organizations [ 25 , 26 ]. Following the review of these guidelines, we adapted specific questions from existing digital literacy assessments for community health workers to create a first version of the planned survey [ 34 ].…”

“…The digital health needs assessment survey was informed by best practice guidelines from the WHO and other organizations [25,26]. Following the review of these guidelines, we adapted specific questions from existing digital literacy assessments for community health workers to create a first version of the planned survey [34]. We carried out content validation of the tools with assistance from the Ministry of Health NCD experts, who reviewed and offered recommendations to ensure the tools' contextual relevance and acceptability.…”

Sustainability of ‘mHealth’ interventions in sub-Saharan Africa: a stakeholder analysis of an electronic community case management project in Malawi

“…Five workshops and three courses22 were conducted to equip HSAs and Senior HSAs with adequate knowledge and skills to use smartphones and computers. These also aimed to enhance the participants' understanding of the potential application of eHealth and mHealth in health care service provision and public health policy.…”