Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2019.107246
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Train rail defect classification detection and its parameters learning method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 7 shows the different parameters and indicators, and the comparison between the existing methods and our system. As can be seen from the table, although the traditional mathematical modeling [29] was faster than the deep-learning-based mapping, its accuracy was not high because it could not adapt to most nonlinear distortion relations. If the distortion correction was carried out without the down-sampling operation, we can see that a large amount of processing time was lost, while the accuracy and SSIM exponential increase was not high.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 7 shows the different parameters and indicators, and the comparison between the existing methods and our system. As can be seen from the table, although the traditional mathematical modeling [29] was faster than the deep-learning-based mapping, its accuracy was not high because it could not adapt to most nonlinear distortion relations. If the distortion correction was carried out without the down-sampling operation, we can see that a large amount of processing time was lost, while the accuracy and SSIM exponential increase was not high.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The significant issue is that complicated background noises pollute the defect images. Diverse hand-crafted processing approaches (e.g., [ 15 , 16 ]) have been developed to extract defect features, but are either sensitive to noises or dependent on expert experience. A coarse-to-fine model was established by Yu et al [ 17 ] for defect detection, but with several significant parameters determined by experience.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rail defect research is pivotal for railway companies [1]. Therefore, they have put plenty of effort into rail defect detection and related maintenance [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11]. This research presents a new type of data-driven method for rail defects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The research is limited to the surface defects, and it is not related to manufacturing technologies of welds and the materials of welds [27]. Other researchers have also not claimed any success or viable solutions to the problems we are working on [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][21][22][28][29][30]. We first extract all the key features related to the problems and first utilize data mining approaches for weld defect prediction problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%