2013
DOI: 10.1213/ane.0b013e31828841e3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Train-of-Four and Tetanic Fade Are Not Always a Prejunctional Phenomenon as Evaluated by Toxins Having Highly Specific Pre- and Postjunctional Actions

Abstract: Background Nerve-stimulated fade in muscle is generally accepted as a prejunctional phenomenon mediated by block of prejunctional acetylcholine receptors (AChRs) at the nerve terminal, while decrease of twitch tension is considered a postjunctional effect due to block of muscle AChRs. Using ligands with specific pre or postjunctional effects only, we tested the hypothesis that fade is not necessarily a prejunctional phenomenon. Methods Neuromuscular function in rats was evaluated after intramuscular (2.5U) o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…19 Tibialis anterior muscle was also studied with and without stimulation of the sciatic nerve with bipolar electrode at the supramaximal voltage. 23 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19 Tibialis anterior muscle was also studied with and without stimulation of the sciatic nerve with bipolar electrode at the supramaximal voltage. 23 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16 For example, waglerin-1, a potent antagonist of muscle nAChRs in mice has minimal effects in rats. 16 Therefore, fade observed during postsynaptic nAChRs block 15 may be restricted to rats, and not observed in another rodent species.…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…On the other hand, specific block of postjunctional muscle nAChRs with α-bungarotoxin (α-BTX) alone also induced TOF fade in rats. 15 Thus, the exact role of prejunctional vs postjunctional nAChRs in the mediation of fade is unclear. The response to nAChR antagonists can differ between species.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inhibition of the presynaptic facilitatory α3β2 nAChR autoreceptor at motor nerve terminals and the resulting inhibition of autofacilitatory ACh release has been suggested as an explanation for the train-of-four fade seen during a non-depolarizing neuromuscular block 28,29 . However, this hypothesis was recently challenged by using ligands with different selectivities for pre-and post-synaptic receptors 34 . Therefore, due to their original dual muscular/α3β2 nAChRs antagonist property, it was of interest to determine whether α-CIA and the cCIA analogues were able to produce TOF fade.…”
Section: Train-of-four (Tof) Fade In the Presence Of Conotoxins With Muscle And Dual Muscle/α3β2 Selectivitymentioning
confidence: 99%