2017 IEEE 20th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/itsc.2017.8317795
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Traffic responsive intersection control algorithm using GPS data

Abstract: This paper reports on the performance of signalised intersection control using vehicle GPS information compared to fixed-time and inductive loop based control. Traffic congestion forecasts estimate an increase of about 60% in 2030. At present, poor choice of signal timings by isolated intersection controllers cause traffic delays that have enormous negative impacts on the economy and environment. Signal timings can be improved by using vehicles' GPS information to overcome the control action deficit at isolate… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(14 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The MATS algorithm does this in a novel way that combines 3 data sources (fixedtime plans, loop detectors, and CVs) rather than two, as is typical in the literature. This paper completes the concepts introduced in [23,24] by modifying the algorithm to be robust in real-world networks, addressing mode-switching issues, and performing simulations under a comprehensive testing framework. The proposed microsimulation testing framework is unique in that it combines data from the Birmingham and West Midlands traffic data portal [25] with OpenStreetMap (OSM) data [26] to create a large-scale, current, and realistic simulation case study.…”
Section: A Related Workmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The MATS algorithm does this in a novel way that combines 3 data sources (fixedtime plans, loop detectors, and CVs) rather than two, as is typical in the literature. This paper completes the concepts introduced in [23,24] by modifying the algorithm to be robust in real-world networks, addressing mode-switching issues, and performing simulations under a comprehensive testing framework. The proposed microsimulation testing framework is unique in that it combines data from the Birmingham and West Midlands traffic data portal [25] with OpenStreetMap (OSM) data [26] to create a large-scale, current, and realistic simulation case study.…”
Section: A Related Workmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…It is expected that in the future, because of the continuous extension of road networks, continuous increase in the amount of motor vehicle ownership, and increase in the mileage of annual driving, the energy consumption of road traffic will continue to increase (Leard et al, 2019), making the pollution problem more serious. And expected to increase traffic congestion by 60% in 2030 (Rafter et al, 2017). At present, relevant government departments, research institutes, and various types of enterprises have conducted significant research to solve traffic congestion and pollution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Signalized intersections comprise of traffic lights, whereas the unsignalized intersections consists of stop or yield signs, or in some instances, no signs at all. The ever-increasing vehicles on roads can lead to congestion [1], traffic delays [2], and economic and societal costs due to crashes [3]. In this context, unsignalized [4] and signalized [5] intersections have been found to be hazardous and inefficient towards catering large volumes of traffic.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the United States National Motor Vehicle Causation Survey, around 35% of the crashes between 2005 and 2007 occurred on intersections, out of which, insufficient situational awareness and ambiguity over intersection priority 1 Connected & Autonomous Vehicle Research Lab (CAVREL), University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, USA. gshah8@knights.ucf.edu 2 Honda Research Institute, Ann Arbor, MI constituted for 44.1% and 8.4%, respectively [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%