2017
DOI: 10.3390/computers6010009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Traffic Priority-Aware Adaptive Slot Allocation for Medium Access Control Protocol in Wireless Body Area Network

Abstract: Biomedical sensors (BMSs) monitor the heterogeneous vital signs of patients. They have diverse Quality of Service (QoS) requirements including reduced collision, delay, loss, and energy consumption in the transmission of data, which are non-constrained, delay-constrained, reliability-constrained, and critical. In this context, this paper proposes a traffic priority-aware adaptive slot allocation-based medium access control (TraySL-MAC) protocol. Firstly, a reduced contention adaptive slot allocation algorithm … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(53 reference statements)
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To ensure that results obtained are realistic and consistent, the simulation model and parameters are designed similarly to [ 9 , 13 , 32 ]. Star topology was adopted with one PAN Coordinator.…”
Section: Performance Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To ensure that results obtained are realistic and consistent, the simulation model and parameters are designed similarly to [ 9 , 13 , 32 ]. Star topology was adopted with one PAN Coordinator.…”
Section: Performance Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A Traffic priority-aware adaptive SLot allocation based MAC (TraySL-MAC) protocol is presented in [15]. In TraySL-MAC, there are three slot allocation algorithms have been developed, such as high threshold vital sign criticality-based, low threshold vital sign criticality-based and reduced contention adaptive slot allocation.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the MAC standard, there is only one queue within a station and does not provide any service differentiation to the flows that might need some QoS. Moreover, the MAC priority-aware protocols are more focused on the priorities of the data frames (super-frames) and solve the slot allocation problems [4], [10], [15], [16]. However, the slot allocation strategy is not preferable for emergency data transmission, because it reduces the performance of MAC protocol in terms of minimum duration of super-frame and slots or insufficient slots, retransmission of collided data packets, delay, a frequent invocation of beacon interval and high energy consumption [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, various MAC schemes have been proposed to decrease energy consumption such as in references [11,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48]. Also, some MAC schemes are aimed to provide traffic prioritization such as in references [49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%