The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2021
DOI: 10.1049/rsn2.12182
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Traffic participants classification based on 3D radio detection and ranging point clouds

Abstract: Traffic participant classification is critical in autonomous driving perception. Millimetre wave radio detection and ranging (RADAR) is a cost‐effective and robust means of performing this task in adverse traffic scenarios such as inclement weather (e.g. fog, snow, and rain) and poor lighting conditions. Compared to commercial two‐dimensional RADAR, the new generation of three‐dimensional (3D) RADAR can obtain height information about targets as well as their dense point clouds, greatly improving target classi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Car have been the easiest to detect (due to its unique signatures) with an average precision of 0.999, almost perfect classification. It can be observed in table 3 that RODNET [44], Ramp CNN [45], Bivariant Cross attention model [48] and MLP-22 [49] also perform considerably better on car classification. However, cars are lower on the vulnerable road user scale and higher emphasis has to be given to pedestrians and bicyclists.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Car have been the easiest to detect (due to its unique signatures) with an average precision of 0.999, almost perfect classification. It can be observed in table 3 that RODNET [44], Ramp CNN [45], Bivariant Cross attention model [48] and MLP-22 [49] also perform considerably better on car classification. However, cars are lower on the vulnerable road user scale and higher emphasis has to be given to pedestrians and bicyclists.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The developed method performs better than the existing method as can be seen in table 3. Pedestrian are detected with average precision of 0.993 by the developed F-ROADNET whereas RODNET [44], Ramp CNN [45], Bivariant Cross attention model [48] and MLP-22 [49] achieved average precision of 0.88, 0.89, 0.91 and 0.90 respectively. Bicyclist have been the most challenging to correctly classify, even so, F-ROADNET achieve average precision of 0.951, exceeding the average precision accomplished by the other methods.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Specifically, if short-and longrange radar sensors are installed at the periphery of an autonomous vehicle, they will monitor the real-time position and speed of surrounding objects, including vehicles and pedestrians [128]. However, 2D radar, which can scan only in the horizontal plane, cannot reconstruct the height information of obstacles, so collisions may occur when the vehicle travels on a height-limited road [129]. 3D radar sensors will be applied to solve the problem.…”
Section: (C) Radio Detection and Ranging (Radar) Sensorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[12] proposed the target classification network using self‐attention mechanisms for millimetre‐wave automotive radar systems. They also classified targets on the road by extracting multidimensional feature vectors from the point cloud data and training the machine learning‐based classifiers with those vectors [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%