2020
DOI: 10.1002/mma.6237
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Traffic model based on synchronous and asynchronous exclusion processes

Abstract: We consider an exclusive process on a closed one‐dimensional lattice. We have used a continuous time version of traffic model based on the deterministic‐stochastic approach developed by A.P. Buslaev. There are cells and particles in the closed contour. Particles can move in both directions. We consider two versions of the system. In the continuous time version, the time interval between attempts of a particle to move is distributed exponentially. The intensity of attempts depends on the particle. In the di… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to the case of clusters equal in length, which was considered previously and in which the average velocity is always the same for both clusters, for different lengths of the clusters, depending on the initial state, either the average velocity of the clusters is the same or the average velocity of one cluster is twice as large as that of the other. We note that the dependence of the average velocity of the clusters on the initial state distinguishes the two-contour system with one-directional motion from simple traffic models, which are systems with particles moving on a one-dimensional infinite or closed grid [1][2][3][4][5]9], in which the average velocity of the particles does not depend on the initial state. But the mathematical traffic models [28] which are investigated by simulation modeling and agree with the three-phase traffic flow theory developed by B. S. Kerner, exhibit, as do the contour networks, a dependence of the average velocity of motion on the initial state.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast to the case of clusters equal in length, which was considered previously and in which the average velocity is always the same for both clusters, for different lengths of the clusters, depending on the initial state, either the average velocity of the clusters is the same or the average velocity of one cluster is twice as large as that of the other. We note that the dependence of the average velocity of the clusters on the initial state distinguishes the two-contour system with one-directional motion from simple traffic models, which are systems with particles moving on a one-dimensional infinite or closed grid [1][2][3][4][5]9], in which the average velocity of the particles does not depend on the initial state. But the mathematical traffic models [28] which are investigated by simulation modeling and agree with the three-phase traffic flow theory developed by B. S. Kerner, exhibit, as do the contour networks, a dependence of the average velocity of motion on the initial state.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analytical results for mathematical traffic models in which particles move according to certain rules on a one-dimensional or two-dimensional grid and which can be interpreted in terms of cellular automata [1] or random processes with prohibitions [2] were obtained, for example, in [3][4][5][6][7][8][9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The article 11 studies a one‐dimensional traffic model with particles of different types. In this model, particles can move forward and backward.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this model, particles can move forward and backward. In Reference 11, a version with discrete time and a version with continuous time are considered. The behavior of the version with discrete time is a synchronous exclusive process (in terms of Reference 10).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation