1993
DOI: 10.2514/atcq.1.3.255
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Traffic Flow Management Modeling with the Time Assignment Model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the formulation of this model is straightforward and easy to understand, its computational performance was weak. Lindsay et al (1993) formulated a disaggregate deterministic 0-1 integer programming model for assigning ground and airborne holding to individual flights in the presence of both airport and airspace capacity constraints. Their proposed Time Assignment Model (TAM) determines the optimal temporal and spatial location of each aircraft, given a set of capacity constraints imposed by National Airspace System (NAS) resources.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the formulation of this model is straightforward and easy to understand, its computational performance was weak. Lindsay et al (1993) formulated a disaggregate deterministic 0-1 integer programming model for assigning ground and airborne holding to individual flights in the presence of both airport and airspace capacity constraints. Their proposed Time Assignment Model (TAM) determines the optimal temporal and spatial location of each aircraft, given a set of capacity constraints imposed by National Airspace System (NAS) resources.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Formulations have been developed to deal also with dynamic situations, when information on capacity changes over time. 12,13 Lindsay et al 14 and Tošic and Babic 15 provide a detailed survey of literature on the optimisation of ground delays.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14,16 Helme 17 describes a multicommodity network flow formulation of this case. Vranas 18 proposes optimisation models for the allocation of ground delays in Europe at the tactical level.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Earlier work has focused on (a) controlling release times of aircraft in the network (ground- holding) in a single airport setting (TERRAB and ODONI, 1991;ODONI, 1993, 1994), and in a multiple airport setting, in which delays propagate through the network (TERRAB and PAULOSE, 1993, VRANAS, BERTSIMAS, and ODONI 1994a, b, AN-DREATTA and TIDONA, 1994, BERTSIMAS and STOCK PATTERSON, 1998, ANDREATTA and BRUNETTA, 1998, BRUNETTA, GUASTALLA, and NAVAZIO 1996 controlling release times and speed adjustments of aircraft while airborne for a network of airports taking into account the capacitated airspace (Bertsimas and Stock Patterson, 1998;HELME, 1994;LINDSAY, BOYD, and BURLINGAME, 1993). For a discussion of the various contributions and a taxonomy of the various problems, see Bertsimas and Stock Patterson (1998) and Andreatta and Brunetta (1998).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%