1996
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-947x(1996)122:3(185)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Traffic Dynamics: Method for Estimating Freeway Travel Times in Real Time from Flow Measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Then, ( ) should be computed as the area enclosed between (V) and (D) curves between times (t-Δt) and (t) and divided by the number of vehicles crossing the downstream detector during the time interval. These different travel time definitions are overlooked in previous studies (Nam and Drew, 1996;Oh et al, 2003, van Arem et al, 1997.…”
Section: Drift Correction From Direct Travel Time Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Then, ( ) should be computed as the area enclosed between (V) and (D) curves between times (t-Δt) and (t) and divided by the number of vehicles crossing the downstream detector during the time interval. These different travel time definitions are overlooked in previous studies (Nam and Drew, 1996;Oh et al, 2003, van Arem et al, 1997.…”
Section: Drift Correction From Direct Travel Time Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Mainly, this is due to the systematic detector drift phenomenon. The count drift between input and output detectors is accumulated in these methods, leading to large errors in the results (Coifman and Cassidy, 2002;Nam and Drew, 1996;Oh et al, 2003). However, input-output methods have two important advantages: first, there is no need for a big density of detectors; and second and most importantly, these methods exhibit forecasting capabilities because the accumulation of vehicles to be served in the near future is known (Soriguera and Robusté, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These models are based on a range of approaches, such as queuing theory, and cross-correlation techniques for measuring the propagation time of traffic and probabilistic regression (Nam and Drew, 1996;Petty et al, 1998).…”
Section: Flow-based Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One approach used the principle of conservation of vehicles by comparing the inflow of a section during previous time period with its outflow during the current time period. This approach was used by Nam and Drew (1996 The results were reported as satisfactory except at the transition periods from congested to un-congested conditions and vice versa.…”
Section: Traffic Flow Theory Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, some of the models performed well for normal-flow conditions only (Nam and Drew, 1996;Hoogendoorn, 2000), while other models are applicable for congested traffic flow conditions only (Nam and Drew, 1998). Another important premise for the traffic flow based models is that all the values of the input and output flows around the boundary of the study road section are available, which in most cases is not the case since most of the ramp flows are not monitored by traffic detectors.…”
Section: Traffic Flow Theory Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%