2016
DOI: 10.1145/3015037.3015042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Traffic class assignment for mixed-criticality frames in TTEthernet

Abstract: In this paper we are interested in mixed-criticality applications, which have functions with different timing requirements, i.e., hard real-time (HRT), soft real-time (SRT) and functions that are not time-critical (NC). The applications are implemented on distributed architectures that use the TTEthernet protocol for communication. TTEthernet supports three traffic classes: Time-Triggered (TT), where frames are transmitted based on static schedule tables; Rate Constrained (RC), for dynamic frames with a guaran… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, the assignments of A i,i and MT w s ⋆ ,i will be determined by propagating the constraints (8) and (6). In the case that the architecture is given as input, we initialize the values of A i,i and BA j according to the given architecture.…”
Section: Topology Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Consequently, the assignments of A i,i and MT w s ⋆ ,i will be determined by propagating the constraints (8) and (6). In the case that the architecture is given as input, we initialize the values of A i,i and BA j according to the given architecture.…”
Section: Topology Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, although we consider UBS in this paper, our approach can handle any combination of traffic types, as long as a timing analysis is available. The choice of traffic type depends on the characteristics of the applications, and the problem of determining the appropriate traffic types has been addressed in [8] for mixed-criticality traffic in TTEthernet.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach has been adapted in (Craciunas et al, 2016) to support the recent IEEE 802.1Q amendment for scheduled traffic (IEEE 802.1Qbv). Time-triggered schedule synthesis has recently been extended in various directions, such as bandwidth optimization for best-effort traffic (Tămaş-Selicean et al, 2015), mixed-criticality systems (Steiner, 2011), resilience to link failures (Avni et al, 2016), traffic class assignment (Gavriluţ and Pop, 2016), and modeling of time-synchronization precision (Zhang et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introduction and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach has been adapted in [7] to support the recent IEEE 802.1Q amendment for scheduled traffic (IEEE 802.1Qbv-2015 [12]). Time-triggered schedule synthesis has recently been extended in various directions, such as bandwidth optimization for best-effort traffic [21], mixedcriticality systems [19], resilience to link failures [3], traffic class assignment [11], and modeling of time-synchronization precision [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%