2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.amp.2020.12.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Traduction et étude de validation de la version française de l’échelle « Specific Loss of Interest and Pleasure Scale, SLIPS » (Échelle de Perte Spécifique de l’Intérêt et du Plaisir, EPSIP)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The SLIPS is scored on a four-point scale (0–3) resulting in a score range of 0–69 with a higher score reflecting a greater severity of anhedonia. The French version of the SLIPS had satisfactory psychometric properties [ 32 ]. The social component of anhedonia is measured either by item # 12 of the BDI-II (LI-BDI) or by the SLIPS.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SLIPS is scored on a four-point scale (0–3) resulting in a score range of 0–69 with a higher score reflecting a greater severity of anhedonia. The French version of the SLIPS had satisfactory psychometric properties [ 32 ]. The social component of anhedonia is measured either by item # 12 of the BDI-II (LI-BDI) or by the SLIPS.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. A few studies have used a 2-item scale (Gabbay et al, 2013;Gabbay, Mao, et al, 2012;Henderson et al, 2013;Loas et al, 2009;Yaseen et al, 2016), a 5-item scale (Dunn et al, 2009), or do not report the number of items in the BDI-derived anhedonia scale used (Dekeuleneer et al, 2021;Satterthwaite et al, 2015).…”
Section: Fundingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 1. A few studies have used a 2-item scale ( Gabbay et al, 2013 ; Gabbay, Ely, et al, 2012 ; Gabbay, Mao, et al, 2012 ; Henderson et al, 2013 ; Loas et al, 2009 ; Yaseen et al, 2016 ), a 5-item scale ( Dunn et al, 2009 ), or do not report the number of items in the BDI-derived anhedonia scale used ( Dekeuleneer et al, 2021 ; Satterthwaite et al, 2015 ). Two studies have used a different 3-item scale that includes Items 4, 12, and 15, and not Item 21 ( Loas et al, 2018 ; Nizet et al, 2018 ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%