Traduction en français du « Brief Illness Perceived Questionnaire » adapté aux patients lombalgiques et étude de ses qualités métrologiques

Demoulin, Christophe; Duvallon, Louise; Roussel, Nathalie; Humblet, Fabienne; Bornheim, Stephen; Harry, Ellen; Salamun, Irène; Lambert, Adélaïde; Koch, David; Mahieu, Geneviève; Crielaard, Jean-Michel; Vanderthommen, Marc; Bruyère, Olivier

doi:10.1016/s1169-8330(16)30511-7

Cited by 6 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The answers to this item are analyzed by identifying the causes that are most often reported 28. A French version of the Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire was validated in 2016 29. For the CR group, we adapted the questionnaire to assess their causal beliefs and negative perceptions about the patient’s illness 30.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…28 A French version of the Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire was validated in 2016. 29 For the CR group, we adapted the questionnaire to assess their causal beliefs and negative perceptions about the patient's illness. 30 We chose to analyze 3 items that allowed for direct evaluation by the CRs (probable duration of the illness, lack of effectiveness of pharmacological treatment, and frequency of symptoms), while we did not include the other items involving indirect evaluation that would present risks of bias.…”

Section: Assessment Toolsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Causal Beliefs About and Perceptions of Illness in Persons Experiencing Schizophrenia and in Close Relatives of Such Individuals: An Exploratory Study

Villani

Kovess–Masféty

2023

Journal of Psychiatric Practice

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: The cause to which persons experiencing schizophrenia attribute their illness influences emotional and adjustment variables. This is also true for close relatives (CRs), who are important players in the affected individual’s environment and whose mood can influence the person’s day-to-day life or treatment adherence. Recent literature has highlighted a need to further explore the impact of causal beliefs on different aspects of recovery as well as on stigma. Aims: The objective of this study was to explore causal beliefs about the illness and their relationship to other illness perceptions and stigma among persons experiencing schizophrenia and their CRs. Methods: Twenty French individuals experiencing schizophrenia and 27 CRs of individuals with schizophrenia answered the Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire, which investigates probable causes of an illness and other illness perceptions, and the Stigma Scale. A semi-structured interview was used to collect information about diagnosis, treatment, and access to psychoeducation. Results: The individuals with schizophrenia identified fewer causal attributions than the CRs. They were more likely to endorse psychosocial stress and family environment as probable causes, while CRs mostly favored genetic explanations. We found significant relationships between causal attributions and most negative perceptions of the illness, including components of stigma, in both samples. Among CRs, having received family psychoeducation was strongly correlated with viewing substance abuse as a probable cause. Conclusions: Relationships between causal beliefs about illness and perceptions of illness both in individuals experiencing schizophrenia and in CRs of such individuals should be explored further with harmonized and detailed tools. Assessing causal beliefs about schizophrenia as a framework for psychiatric clinical practice could prove useful for all those involved in the recovery process.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Assessment Toolsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Causal Beliefs About and Perceptions of Illness in Persons Experiencing Schizophrenia and in Close Relatives of Such Individuals: An Exploratory Study

Villani

Kovess–Masféty

2023

Journal of Psychiatric Practice

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Psychological factors: patients’ expectations and perceptions will be administered with the revised Illness Perceptions Questionnaire31–33 and fear of reinjury21 22 will be assessed with Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK-11) 34…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…29 ► Structural knee joint damage on MRI: assessed with the Anterior Cruciate Ligament OsteoArthritis Score 30 at baseline and 3 months postrandomisation. ► Psychological factors: patients' expectations and perceptions will be administered with the revised Illness Perceptions Questionnaire [31][32][33] and fear of reinjury 21 22 will be assessed with Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK-11). 34 ► Quality and adherence of rehabilitation: evaluated with the EARS and a customised questionnaire that contains questions about the exercises that the participants performed, the intensity, duration and frequency of their rehabilitation.…”

Section: Secondary Feasibility Outcomesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Pilot study to investigate the feasibility of conducting a randomised controlled trial that compares Immediate versus Optional Delayed surgical repair for treatment of acute Anterior cruciate ligament injury: IODA pilot trial

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

IntroductionStandard care for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries includes surgical reconstruction of the ACL. However, two randomised controlled trials (RCTs) concluded that conservative treatment does not result in inferior clinical outcomes compared with immediate ACL reconstruction. More research is needed to in the first place verify these results, and second to assess whether patient-specific parameters determine whether a patient would benefit from one treatment option over the other. However, before running a full RCT, it seems necessary to perform a pilot study that assesses the feasibility of recruiting patients with ACL for such a RCT. This is because recruitment may be challenging as many patients have strong treatment beliefs. Therefore, this pilot study will assess whether a large RCT is feasible with regard to participant recruitment, adherence to the allocated treatment arm and protocol feasibility. These pilot findings will help deciding about progressing to a future full RCT.Methods and analysisThis is a pragmatic, multicentre, randomised controlled pilot trial with two parallel groups. Patients with an acute ACL injury will be recruited from two Belgian hospitals. Patients will be randomised to either conservative treatment or surgical treatment. Patients will be followed-up at 3, 6 and 12 months postrandomisation. Recruitment feasibility will be evaluated by calculating the recruitment rate 4 months after the two sites have been initiated. Clear criteria for progression to a full trial are defined. Adherence to the protocol will be assessed by calculating the proportion of patients who complete the assessments. Furthermore the proportion of patients who cross-over between treatment arms during the follow-up period will be assessed.Ethics and disseminationThe study was approved by the ethical committees: Ethische Commissie Onderzoek UZ/KU Leuven (S62004) and Comité d’Ethique Hospitalo-Facultaire Universitaire de Liège (2020212). Results will be made available to caregivers, researchers and funder.Trial registration numberThis trial is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04408690) on 29 May 2020.

show abstract

“…These experiences and personal/contextual factors heavily influence patients' pain. Indeed, pain beliefs and behaviours might explain the persistence of pain in some patients [6][7][8][9][10]. Hence the importance of addressing all these factors, including beliefs, emotions, and behaviour when managing a patient suffering from LBP.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

How Do Physiotherapists Explain Influencing Factors to Chronic Low Back Pain? A Qualitative Study Using a Fictive Case of Chronic Non-Specific Low Back Pain

Vanderstraeten

Fourré

Demeure

et al. 2023

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: While pain is influenced by multiple factors including psychosocial factors, previous research has shown that physiotherapists still favour a biomedical approach. Purpose: To evaluate: (1) how physiotherapists explain the patient’s chronic non-specific low back pain (LBP); (2) whether physiotherapists use one or multiple influencing factors, and (3) whether these factors are framed in a biopsychosocial or biomedical approach. Materials and methods: This exploratory qualitative study uses a vignette depicting chronic non-specific LBP and employs a flexible framework analysis. Physiotherapists were asked to mention contributing factors to the pain based on this vignette. Five themes were predefined (“Beliefs”, “Previous experiences”, “Emotions”, “Patients behaviour”, “Contextual factors”) and explored. Results: Physiotherapists use very brief explanations when reporting contributing factors to chronic pain (median 13 words). Out of 670 physiotherapists, only 40% mentioned more than two different themes and 2/3rds did not see any link between the patients’ misbeliefs and pain. Only a quarter of the participants mentioned the patient’s worries about pain and movement, which is considered to be an important influencing factor. Conclusion: The lack of a multifactorial approach and the persistent biomedical beliefs suggest that it remains a challenge for physiotherapists to fully integrate the biopsychosocial framework into their management of chronic LBP.

show abstract

Traduction en français du « Brief Illness Perceived Questionnaire » adapté aux patients lombalgiques et étude de ses qualités métrologiques

Cited by 6 publications

References 1 publication

Causal Beliefs About and Perceptions of Illness in Persons Experiencing Schizophrenia and in Close Relatives of Such Individuals: An Exploratory Study

Causal Beliefs About and Perceptions of Illness in Persons Experiencing Schizophrenia and in Close Relatives of Such Individuals: An Exploratory Study

Pilot study to investigate the feasibility of conducting a randomised controlled trial that compares Immediate versus Optional Delayed surgical repair for treatment of acute Anterior cruciate ligament injury: IODA pilot trial

How Do Physiotherapists Explain Influencing Factors to Chronic Low Back Pain? A Qualitative Study Using a Fictive Case of Chronic Non-Specific Low Back Pain

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About