Traditional Mapuche ecological knowledge in Patagonia, Argentina: fishes and other living beings inhabiting continental waters, as a reflection of processes of change

Abstract

BackgroundUnderstanding how people interpret environmental change and develop practices in response to such change is essential to comprehend human resource use. In the cosmology of the American indigenous peoples, as among the Mapuche people, freshwater systems are considered a living entity, where animals have an enormous role to play in the universe of meaning. However, human adaptive responses to freshwater system dynamics are scarcely examined. In this work a survey is carried out in three Mapuche communities of Argentine Patagonia to assess their traditional knowledge of the fishes and other non-human living beings that inhabit lakes and rivers. Both material and symbolic aspects are included, as are the differences in knowledge and use of the fishes between past and present times.MethodsOur methods were based on a quali-quantitative fieldwork approach. In-depth interviews were carried out with 36 individuals from three rural Mapuche populations in Neuquén province (Patagonia, Argentina). Free listing was used for inquiring about fish knowledge and use. Fishes were identified scientifically and ethnotaxonomically. In-depth analysis of the discourses was conducted, documenting the recognition, perception, and cultural significance of fluvial environments and their inhabitants. Quantitative survey results were analyzed with categorical statistical methods.ResultsThe body of knowledge of the communities studied reflects the socio-environmental changes experienced by Patagonian freshwater bodies. According to local perception, non-human beings live in these water bodies, guarding the environment, and they should not be disturbed. At present, five different fish species are identified, three of which are exotic, having been introduced at the beginning of the 20th century by the white man. These exotic trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss and Salvelinus fontinalis) are considered ill omens, indicators of the white man’s presence, and therefore their appearance presages negative events for the families. In addition, we found that Mapuche people differentiate fish species mainly by morphological, organoleptic and ecological attributes. Current consumption of fish by Mapuche communities is sporadic, in accordance with bibliography and ancient tales. Several fishing tools are used, including modern elements.ConclusionsOur data enable us to characterise dynamic traditional knowledge in these communities, which is flexible in nature and adaptable to new situations, demonstrated by the incorporation not only of new species but also new fishing tools. It also seems that new significances become absorbed in synchrony with the advance or arrival of exotic and invasive species. For the Mapuche, the presence of the white man heralded by exotic trouts speaks of how a recent event, such as the introduction of the salmonids, is already incorporated into Mapuche symbolism. Mapuche traditional knowledge and cosmovision on the use of fish and waters, a vision which promotes respect and the avoidance of actions that could disturb the beings ...

A biocultural and intercultural response to firewood scarcity in rural communities inhabiting arid environments in Patagonia (Argentina)

“…Interwoven into these practices are rules and social codes that ensure these resources are used in accordance with local needs, mainly involving guidelines related to the care and renovation of natural elements in the surroundings (Aigo andLadio 2016; Ladio andMolares 2016).…”

River science and management issues in Chile: Hydropower development and native fish communities

“…To our knowledge, this is the first river restoration project in Chile to improve habitat quality of native fish species based on ecohydraulic criteria (Link & Habit, 2012). (Aigo & Ladio, 2016) in comparison with other regions of the world (Te Aho, in press).…”

“…The “Mesa Participativa para la Hidroelectricidad Sustentable” project for example, had the active involvement of multiple stakeholders, including the Mapuche—the indigenous inhabitants of south‐central Chile and south‐western Argentina. Nonetheless, the use and integration of indigenous knowledge in biodiversity conservation is generally limited (Aigo & Ladio, ) in comparison with other regions of the world (Te Aho, in press).…”

Ethnobiology and research on Global Environmental Change: what distinctive contribution can we make?

“…For example, the ethnoecological work of Aigo and Ladio (2016) has contributed to freshwater resource management by providing empirical evidence of the critical role of local perceptions in promoting sustainable management of natural resources. This investigation has shown that Mapuche traditional cosmovision on the use of fish and waters, a relationist vision which promotes respect and avoidance of actions that could disturb the beings (animals and sacred or mythological characters) that inhabit and take care of them, should be fostered as part of…”

“…The dominant knowledge system, SK, which belongs to westernurban society, with a dualist cosmovision that separates Nature from Culture, and the TEK system commonly found in originaltraditionalrural societies where the NatureCulture relationship takes precedence, and where biodiversity is maintained through management practices and social networks (Delgado and Escóbar 2006). From a relationist perspective, biodiversity is animated and the players which are active in the processes involved include both natural and supernatural forces (Aigo and Ladio 2016).…”