2021
DOI: 10.26633/rpsp.2021.48
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Traditional, complementary, and integrative medicine evidence map: a methodology to an overflowing field of data and noise

Abstract: Every day there is criticism about lack of evidence on traditional, complementary, and integrative medicine (TCIM). But is this narrative evidence-based? Are we really missing research about TCIM? Or are we just not looking correctly at the evidence? Evidence maps are a useful method with the dual function of synthesizing available evidence on a specific topic and identifying knowledge gaps. This article presents a six-step evidence map methodology along with recently published TCIM evidence maps, including on… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This evidence map was developed according to the methodology from the Pan American Health Organization/World Health Organization (PAHO/WHO) Latin American and Caribbean Center on Health Sciences Information (BIREME), which has previously been applied to traditional, complementary, and integrative medicine (7). The working group was formed of six researchers on VL and one librarian with experience on evidence maps, which delimited the theme and scope, criteria for inclusion and exclusion of studies, and data to be extracted.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This evidence map was developed according to the methodology from the Pan American Health Organization/World Health Organization (PAHO/WHO) Latin American and Caribbean Center on Health Sciences Information (BIREME), which has previously been applied to traditional, complementary, and integrative medicine (7). The working group was formed of six researchers on VL and one librarian with experience on evidence maps, which delimited the theme and scope, criteria for inclusion and exclusion of studies, and data to be extracted.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We developed this evidence map based on a previous methodological study ( 35 ) and the International Initiative for Impact Evaluation Evidence Gap Methodolog y (3iE) ( 36 ). This study was reported in compliance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping reviews ( 37 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This Evidence Map summarizes the interventions and health outcomes related to MBTTCM. These evidence maps considered six steps, each with a set of activities: (1) Search, (2) Selection, (3) Categorization, (4) Informetric, (5) Evidence map, and (6) Gaps ( 17 ). The method and results were reported according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines ( 18 ) and the International Initiative for Impact Evaluation (3iE) Evidence Gap Methodology ( 19 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%