2017
DOI: 10.1111/dsji.12119
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Traditional and Online Learning in Executive Education: How Both Will Survive and Thrive

Abstract: An important component of corporate training is executive education. A sample of 90 open enrollment executive education programs in the areas of management development and leadership was reviewed to better understand the structure of the offerings. In today's marketplace, the majority of executive education offerings are of the traditional face‐to‐face classroom‐style format. More recently, the impact of rapid technological advancements is becoming more apparent in the executive education market as online lear… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Examples of studies addressing these issues are in Lobel et al (2005) and Stanton and Stanton (2017).…”
Section: Interaction In and Beyond Ictenhanced Face-to-face Classroommentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples of studies addressing these issues are in Lobel et al (2005) and Stanton and Stanton (2017).…”
Section: Interaction In and Beyond Ictenhanced Face-to-face Classroommentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the cost of university executive education has made it inaccessible for a large number of managers who seek to cope with the rapidly changing corporate practices (Stanton & Stanton, 2017). Universities had been criticized for offering admission for Executive MBA without setting any standard and making it a source of making money (Hilgert, 1996).…”
Section: Challenges For Executive Mbamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Business schools have become players in numerous and diversified PD markets (Amdam, 2016;Smith & Keaveney, 2017;Stanton & Stanton, 2017). However, with all the resources spent on PDP, there is little evidence that it has added value to participants or their firms (Pfeffer & Fong, 2002;Tushman, et al, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%