Trading quality for relevance: non-health decision-makers’ use of evidence on the social determinants of health

Abstract

ObjectivesLocal government services and policies affect health determinants across many sectors such as planning, transportation, housing and leisure. Researchers and policymakers have argued that decisions affecting wider determinants of health, well-being and inequalities should be informed by evidence. This study explores how information and evidence are defined, assessed and utilised by local professionals situated beyond the health sector, but whose decisions potentially affect health: in this case, practitioners working in design, planning and maintenance of the built environment.DesignA qualitative study using three focus groups. A thematic analysis was undertaken.SettingThe focus groups were held in UK localities and involved local practitioners working in two UK regions, as well as in Brazil, USA and Canada.ParticipantsUK and international practitioners working in the design and management of the built environment at a local government level.ResultsParticipants described a range of data and information that constitutes evidence, of which academic research is only one part. Built environment decision-makers value empirical evidence, but also emphasise the legitimacy and relevance of less empirical ways of thinking through narratives that associate their work to art and philosophy. Participants prioritised evidence on the acceptability, deliverability and sustainability of interventions over evidence of longer term outcomes (including many health outcomes). Participants generally privileged local information, including personal experiences and local data, but were less willing to accept evidence from contexts perceived to be different from their own.ConclusionsLocal-level built environment practitioners utilise evidence to make decisions, but their view of ‘best evidence’ appears to prioritise local relevance over academic rigour. Academics can facilitate evidence-informed local decisions affecting social determinants of health by working with relevant practitioners to improve the quality of local data and evaluations, and by advancing approaches to improve the external validity of academic research.

Evidence-based practice in local public health service in Ghana

“…In this way, they can draw upon the best available evidence combined with their expertise, unique local experiences, and the values and preferences of communities to inform public health practice. This is in line with other studies which have noted that context/localism influences the use of evidence in public health decisions (Kemm, 2006;Woolcock, 2013;McGill et al, 2015;Phillips & Green, 2015) suggesting the need to integrate local best practices and experiences into public health decisions.…”

Implementing a Public Health Objective for Alcohol Premises Licensing in Scotland: A Qualitative Study of Strategies, Values, and Perceptions of Evidence

“…As a function of local government, licensing involves very different “ cultures of evidence ” to those with which public health professionals may be familiar [34,54,55,56,57]. The value of high-level review evidence on health indicators is considerably lower, and may be perceived as having limited transferable value if generated in other countries or contexts [50].…”

Local policies to tackle a national problem: Comparative qualitative case studies of an English local authority alcohol availability intervention

“…Local practitioners have also been found to particularly value evidence from local case studies (McGill et al, 2015).…”